Your spiritual philosophy as stated may approach a soundness that you construe for Truthfulness, but like a lot of theories, it doesn't survive the real world. Interesting, but false.
I appreciate your humility, and I should reciprocate it.
Yes, the Christian mythology has been co-opted and corrupted by dark priests. But they serve a master who we'd be wise to reckon as real. Your disregard for God is a victory for the powers you yourself condemn. Their multi-layered psyop has duped a lot of ppl.
There is a God, and he entered the archetypal framework by condescending incarnation. Pantheism came after monotheism. You can thank the Brotherhood of the Snake for that…I think they're still around here somewhere.
Melchizedek was a priest of the monotheistic old religion, too.
>that Melchizedek Priesthood is a rabbit hole i had to stop digging into …i feel there is something there but im not connected enough with Jesus yet to go there because i worry that it will take me into more gnostic interpretations of the gospel
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I echo your sentiment. For me, my words are often like grass (The grass withers, the flower fades, But the word of our God stands forever.) and their meanings often wither upon articulation. Many things are best left unsaid, holding your tongue, speaking once spoken to….all that stuff.
May you and I be more connected with Jesus in Love principally, and if high things are revealed, so much the better.
Complete Agreement between us.
Onward, these wicked and unhuman glow when I brandish my Sword, no?
I appreciate your summary (glad you reposted since I missed it 1st time). I see a lot of shared perspective vis a vis archetypes and value hierarchies (J. Peterson's work, Jung, too).
The exoteric/esoteric Christian perspective (you sound like an esoteric Christian) is that God made Man in His image with all the things you describe being latent in his programming for the ultimate purpose of recognizing the MYSTICAL/TRANSCENDENT nature of the person of God upon His revelation in Christ Jesus. So I agree with you to a point, and where you stop, I disrobe and jump in the water.
Acts 18:24-26
Meanwhile a Jew named Apollos, a native of Alexandria, came to Ephesus. He was an eloquent man, well versed in the Scriptures. He had been instructed in the way of the Lord and was fervent in spirit. He spoke and taught accurately about Jesus, though he knew only the baptism of John. And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue. When Priscilla and Aquila heard him, they took him in and explained to him the way of God more accurately.
Made in the Image and Likeness of God, redeemed by the blood of the Lamb, a new creation in Jesus' name.
Yeah, pretty much.