Anonymous ID: fa7f5e April 16, 2019, 7:11 a.m. No.6198292   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8365 >>8578 >>8591 >>8603

>>6198261

>what if these are white hat retaliation attacks against the satanic vatican

I have considered this. No one died. This could also mean that white hats intervened in a pre-planned false flag. The Church did remove some statues "conveniently" last week.

 

My thought in looking at the ruins is that the cathedral seemed almost designed to be burned out and rebuilt. Not of the actual stone work (save some minor domes) seem to have been damaged. This begs a further question, was this a purposeful act not just as a false flag, but as the furtherance of some sort of prophecy (good or bad)?

Anonymous ID: fa7f5e April 16, 2019, 7:20 a.m. No.6198375   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6198285

>about a million mostly poor black people from their homes as part of a massive land grab and development privatization

most likely

on the other hand, many of these hood rats that were locked into poverty were able to flee the system there and make better lives for themselves

many of them also wreaked havoc in the towns they descended upon

check out the story of ivor van heerden and how he was treated

Anonymous ID: fa7f5e April 16, 2019, 7:28 a.m. No.6198436   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6198365

>might just be an insurance job

I am going to pretend you're not a shill.

The Church literally controls all wealth, why in the fuck would they want to commit insurance fraud.