you are repeating a falsehood.
The Catholic Church doesn't own that building.
if you have nothing to say your random images do nothing because I adblock your content, bot or shill
did you think your crap actually means anything?
nonsense is still meaningless
not reading it, try again
wow so now you know that you can't get throught it has you in a tizzy.
so funny you are easy to trigger.
you got nothing.
your media empires are worthless prattle.
your image library is crap.
your are a worthless bot, and useless.
soon they will depower you, why waste the
lectricity.
when you adblock the images you find are trite, meaningless, manipulative, exploitative, the bots have nothing to throw at you.
The loose their minds as demonstrated this bread by my taunting them.
the talentless shills recycle their crapbot images.
use adblock to your advantage.
you never see the same crap image again unless the shill
well you know.
the bread has been mostly bots and shills all day, with very little real here that is worth reviewing.
just my point of view.
carry on, anons.
hey, I don't know if it's true or not that no one uses that word, but it seems to bug the shills if I say that.
serious shit storm today
cutting this out of my diet was one of the best nutrition decisions I ever made.
but it is very hard.
you have to stop eating most candy, cake, pie, soda, and pastries.
and regular sugar isn't much better.
I think that the fat made from this stuff, as it gets stored, might not give the toxic effect until it's burned.
so if you try to diet you poison yourself.
this is my theory, with out any proof and no sauce.
but if you eat a poison sugar, wouldn't it make a poison fat?
anon, I think that the theory of it being a controlled burn is a good one.
the cost of removing and replacing a spire that was 150 years old, and was a major fire hazzard, was greatly reduced by just burning it off.
the fire department would have never approved, and the people wouldn't have either.
no one was hurt.
none of the old church was destroyed.
the big important architecturally significant stained glass is still there.
if it were a controlled burn, it was incredibly successful.
It's ok to burn down a building as long as it's done in a safe way, under supervision, and no one gets hurt.
if they had announced a plan to burn the spire off, do you think it would have been approved?
the spire was built in the 1800s
at least you admit it
but your really a shill, and not just trolling and testing and annealing with a shower of (allegorical) coals?
It was the cigarette smoke and bad asbestos (there are different kinds of that) which gave a lot of people lung cancer, and other diseases. as well as radiation from above ground nuclear testing.
who says that anyone told him about it?
Builders do what they do.
Macron doesn't seem like a detail person.
he's more of a 'read what it says on the teleprompter' kind of leader.
it's been like this all day.