Anonymous ID: 972e0f April 16, 2019, 4:21 p.m. No.6203626   🗄️.is 🔗kun

=POTUS,"Just signed a critical bill to formalize drought contingency plans for the Colorado River.

Thanks to @SenMcSallyAZ for getting it done."

Big deal for Arizona!"=

 

This is a big deal for Arizona.

Looks like Arizona has been battling this a long time.

POTUS was the only one who could of made this possible in DC.

 

Here are are some cases AZ has been adjudicating with california.

 

 

The cases involved were all named Arizona v. California, and were decided in 1931, 1934, 1936, 1963, 1964, 1966, 1979, 1983, 1984, and 2000.

 

The original decision, 283 U.S. 423 (1931), specified the amount of water to which Arizona was entitled under the Colorado River Compact of 1922.

 

Since then, the case has been relitigated several times because of Arizona's claims of California using more water than it is entitled.

 

292 U.S. 341 (1934): Arizona argued that the Colorado River Compact was unconstitutional.

298 U.S. 558 (1936): Arizona requested that the Supreme Court:

specify an amount of Colorado River water for Arizona's use

limit the amount allotted to California

373 U.S. 546 (1963): The court specified the amount of water to which each state in the Colorado River Compact was entitled.

376 U.S. 340 (1964): The court adjusted the amounts of water specified in 373 US 546.

383 U.S. 268 (1966): The court adjusted its previous decree.

439 U.S. 419 (1979): The court adjusted the specified amounts of water for all parties to the case.

460 U.S. 605 (1983): The court issued a decree regarding unadjudicated rights of Indian tribes to Colorado River water.

466 U.S. 144 (1984): The court adjusted its previous decree.

531 U.S. 1 (2000): The court adjusted the specified amounts of water for several parties to the case.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._California