>>6205808 (LB)

Yes. So do some Assembly of God churches.

It generally stems from a literalist interpretation of revelation by John Nelson Darby, whose literalist interpretation of the Book of Revelation is the origin of the entire "Left Behind" train of thought.

The prophecies in the Book of Revelation have literally never been perceived in a literal sense by either the Catholics or Protestants going back to when the Christian religion began to formalize and splinter. We've argued several different theories for centuries, but not literal interpretation.

>>6206144

Yes

>>6206120

Large meteor

>>6206218

Nope. There is no such law.

>>6206239

>>6206456

Amusing.

Tell me, to which hermaneutical theory(ies) do you subscribe?

I've read Revelation. Many times. More importantly, I understand it. When you can tell me the name of the historical figure to whom the number six hundred threescore and six referenced, I'll be mildly impressed at your improvement. In the meantime, probare te, et stultus non loqui

>>6206531

Not if you're hosting MTV

>>6206534

I'm pretty sure most pilots would agree that's the only way to wank it down.

>>6206514

That looks like a moldy prune with a cotton ball stuck on top.

>>6206585

Still looks like a moldy prune with a cotton ball stuck on top. The point stands until debunked, fren. KEK!