Without actual evidence, of course… just conjecture. You people live on that.
It truly is a good thing none of you are in charge of our justice system.
>what evidence its public record retard
That's what I'd like to know…you don't have any actual evidence, yet somehow you just KNOW…
Do you know what "conjecture" means?
>Mueller covered up 9/11
How do you know?
>jailed innocent people
According to whom, those he jailed? Bet you believe McCabe, too.
>covered up for the deep state money laundering at BCCI / HSBC
Sauce.
>participated in U1
Did you actually read the emails? He delivered 10 grams to the Russians.
That's how WE let them know where it came from. Seriously, this
is actually public, but nooooo, you can't be bothered with the facts.
Do you even know how big a 10 gram sample of uranium is?
>need I go on?
Please do, lightweights like you are pretty easy game, and fun to toy with.
Still not sauce, just your conjecture. You really aren't convincing. Go ahead,
provide proof. All you have is conjecture because you lack context.
Sauce.
I dare you. Actual irrefutable sauce, not just "I KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS!"
You can't, because you don't have it and you KNOW IT. That's the funny
part. You know you're beat, that's why you pathetic fools try so hard to
convince everyone what is so obviously wrong. No, if anyone should be
necking herself it should be you, Hillary.
People actually providing sauce for their ridiculous claims?
No can do. There's a reason these shills exist. They want to drive us to
delegitimizing the Mueller report. They have nothing left. They've been
in overdrive since they realized nothing was going to materialize. All
they have left is "Mueller is a dirty cop!" That's it. That's ALL these pathetic
fools have left. They have lost.
Nothing more true than this, anon. Nothing.
Tyranny stops dead in its tracks the moment we all realize that we're in charge.
The biggest joke the elite has played on civilization was when we gave them the
power they wield.
> Are you just fucking around?
Are you just stupid? What does that prove? Seriously, show us.
>There's a difference between controlling the narrative from our end and being stupid enough to suggest he wasn't complicit somehow.
Without evidence… hmmm, what's the definition of "conjecture" again?
>Also, that's not a new theory by any means.
Yeah, lots of bad theories are old. That doesn't make them legitimate.
>There's no way you can't find some even some slightly convincing source material on the subject if you spend even ten minutes looking.
Slightly convincing is sort of the definition of conjecture, isn't it?
Proof.
>This "give me sources" pouting just makes you look lazy.
If you had it, you'd post it. You don't. Which of us is lazy again?
Well, given that Trump came along I'd suggest that maybe we woke up enough
to stop this. But it's only 2 years in, I can wait a few more to be sure. Can you?
I'm plenty serious, you can't seem to provide any evidence of your position.
I guess that makes you…
"BELIEVE ME BECAUSE I SAID SO!"
Prove it, I'll belive it. Until then…
Might as well be shouting about getting off the lawn or something.
The revolution already happened. The only thing we're waiting on is outing
the losers and the media that supported them. Really, the "opposition" is
nothing more than the idiots in the media and the morons shilling in here
and elsewhere on social media sites. They're gone.
How is an opinion article sauce for anything?
If anything comes out of this whole affair it should be that people recognize
the difference between opinion and fact. Just becausue someone posts an
opinion doesn't mean it's fact. Go through that article and every place RM is
mentioned what assumptions about context (or actual evidence) are being made?
Really, I dare you. There's ALWAYS an assumption that has no basis in fact.
ALWAYS.
>Something about Q's last post has left me with a slight feeling of non-comfiness.
Huh, not me, but OK.
>Hate to be a concernfag but there it is.
At this point I don't mind people being concernfags.
It's been a long haul. I don't blame anyone for being concerned anymore.
Remember, Q has always said to use logic. You don't need any other
claim from Q to see the path forward.
What's that got to do with anything I was replying to? Just curious.
Defango is a bit of a tool, and proved that loooong before all of the
Q stuff went down, btw. Just sayin…
Advice we should all take, me included. It's hard to disambiguate our emotions.
Very hard.
There weren't enough Q episode. I suppose, however, had there been
moar, they would not have been as fun. Oh well.
>anyone else growing a little weary of these one word attempts at proofs/connections or is it just me
Well, 17 months in and…
He's a pundit. He makes money off of people being unaware. He can't help
himself. If he were to go all in and let everyone in on this movement he'd be out
of a job, no better than any other "decoder" out there.
Watch as the truth rolls out he'll slowly start claiming he was always
on board. Just watch…
Future proves past has proven to be quite true. Nearly every "prediction" about what
is coming has been wrong, and always leads to shills coming in here and shitposting.
Of course. Whoa. This was intentional.
Trump damn well knows how to use celebrities to his advantage. Guaranteed.