>>6208507
All teh jews!
>>6208570
Totes doxxed fam!
>>6208595
Does not enjoy jews
>>6208603
Can't tell if bot, weird AI, bored af anon or somebody deeply tormented by jews at some stage of their life.
>>6208618
Bot powered by the AI coded from a bored af anon seeking retribution for tained tendies sold to him by some random jew shopkeep trying to earn a living.
That poor shopkeep had no idea what he created that day.
Holy shit check his post count though (which nearly exclusively includes said word).
What are drinking and how are you still alive?
>>6208695
Sure she isn't jewish?
>>6208695
>>6208709
Hates jews, likes jews? Make up your mind!
Best Joe Biden impersonation award should be presented next.
If that's true. Good job fucktards. Introduce basically ISIS to the entirety of Europe to win at the boys club. slow clap
Meat plunger induced shit?
>>6208760
>>6208290
That meme sucks pretty bad.
>>6208771
Yeah, nahh.
The dumbshit part is things like this.
“I don't want to live in a world where everything I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity and love or friendship is recorded.”
What do you think he meant by "everything I do"?
Ie. Video recording. Not fucking mind control..
>>6208780
Most people take a shit these days with their phone due to boredom. I guess so?
>>6208789
Nahh just literal shitposting
Waiting for the xbox release
I think the problem is a huge rise of endorphins and dopamine increase when Q is engaging with the community. When that isn't happening you aren't getting that and are suffering from what most people would call withdrawals.
If you make this too much of your life, its not a healthy thing. Everything in moderation.
Also by the same rhetoric. When does race dilution come into it.
When are people considered just people and not branded by race due to the fact they carry some genetic traits?
The whole thing is a fuck show to be labeling muh joos because they have some genetic heritage of it.
My issue with the whole Assange thing is. Q has been right sometimes. CDAN has been right a LOT more.
CDAN has some pretty eye opening blinds on Assange's associations.
Leaves me wondering what to think TBH.
Was he going for the super saiyan look in the 3rd pic?
This blind in particular.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-items-revealed-38.html
Wednesday, July 04, 2018
Blind Items Revealed #38
May 22, 2018
I really wanted to call this one full circle, but think I have used that name before.This involves three women and a few men, but it is the way this all came to be which is the most interesting thing. The first woman we will call A. You all know her and she ended up with the job. She was not the first or even the second choice, but in the long run, she has worked out well and looking back, probably the best choice.
A (former A- list mostly television actress) was chosen by a guy named M. M is one of those guys who has a ton of money and throws enough in the air until women close their eyes and shut out all thought until the sexual act is over. A always seems to need money and has openly admitted in the past to exchanging sex for money. Meanwhile M has kind of collection of one type of woman he wants to sleep with and keeps a running total of them. He has told friends he is up to almost 100. It is a special kind of celebrity.
Anyway, the first choice was kind of unusual. The first choice was B. The reason they wanted B is because she spends a great deal of time in the country where she was needed and famous enough, but not too famous where it would work. Finally, she too is known to accept money for arrangements, but here was the sticking point. Usually, even though she is a permanent A list singer in that country, she is the one bearding for lesser known people and never actually has sex with them. They pay to be seen with her and she will live with them, but there is no sex. According to the demands of the ultimate employer, he wanted to be able to have sex with the woman chosen.
The second choice was an interesting choice. We will call her C. She is an interesting choice. She lives in the country where she was needed. C also fit the bill of famous, but not too famous. She was perfectly willing to have sex when needed and had done that frequently to land many of her reality jobs/singing gigs. What ultimately disqualified her was N. Apparently N had been instructed by his employers that C was being claimed, yes that was the word used, by someone who she had yachted with in the past and he wanted her available to him when needed. N and M are best buddies.
So, in the end, A was chosen and has been doing it for several years at this point. She has made over $1M for her work. Will she end up going to jail? I think it is more likely she will end up killed rather than jailed.
A: Pamela Anderson
B: Kylie Minogue
C: Nicole Scherzinger
M: George Soros
N: Julian Assange
Posted by ent lawyer at 6:15 PM
What did you do to show such a high level of remorse?
Surely something triggered such a reaction.
You are allowed to screw up from time to time, it doesn't mean God is going to shun you or its the end of times.
You are feeling something that has been built into you and if you follow it, you are following general morality as a good person.
Best code of practice is to not make the mistakes that make you feel that way and move towards making things better. God, Q or not. Do it for yourself first and foremost.
Makes you wonder how much satanic worship and Islam go hand in hand?
You wonder why leading left politicians and hollyweird types are pushing for acceptance of Islam. It's likely one in the same for them all, or at least trying to frame it that way.
Wasn't the necklace debunked to say "Becoming"?
I'm not sure any dude, especially one as big as Mike would have a necklace commissioned for a church burning?
>>6208915
Chicken, is that code for "tendies" ?
It's nice to hear some slight logic in here sometimes.
I have no idea about Islam as I've never really delved into wanting to research whatever bastardized version of whatever it is they are preaching these days. If it's bad enough people can interpret it in a way they want to kill non believers and themselves in the process I've just kind of not had a really pull to want to research it to that level.
Seems like edited pieces of any religious followings were done for untoward reasons.
Be nice to see the source of it all, not the badly translated and heavily edited versions we have in our hands today.
Makes you wonder if they still exist.
Makes me angry a lot of things these days are digital representations only and are easily manipulated, edited or wiped from existence. Was much harder with paper or physical objects.
Just do the right thing morally. If things don't feel right don't put yourself into that situation.
You don't need Q, God or a higher power to judge what you do. So long as you do what feels right, that causes no harm to others or yourself and you find a path to some form of happiness you know it's the right path.
>>6208931
What is tendies code for?
You are on the chans….
>>6208952
So you basically want Anderson Cooper's hair to piss on you?
>>6208963
Not really.
Normal vitamin intake and kidney function.
Depends how many time they urinate in a day. For it to be clear as silver you'd want to have basically eaten nothing with nutritional content all day and only consumed water (and a lot of it).
So going by what you are saying is you want a malnourished, vitamin and mineral deficient person who has been loading up with litres upon litres of water all day to unleash an ungodly amount of urine upon your person?
Amirite?
Haha OMG that must have removed over 100 posts.
A smackerel of justice would be nice.
Yeah. What about lower case a for April (NEVER like that) or om (and the o looks edited) instead of PM?
Seems a bit dumb..
Larping as AI bot, doesn't know what a tendie is even with context of chicken being mentioned.
Unsure if double trolling or legit bot.
Been like this for the last damn 10 hours TBH
At least 2 ID's currently too I believe.
You may remember me from earlier today when you started replacing the word "you" for "jew" when I did it to you.
And even applauded when I said your post was "jewcy".
Pretty sure you are just a bored anon. You've made that many spelling errors but also corrected them before being called out on them.
Only thing that doesn't sit well is you were unaware of what I meant by "tendie" in that context.
I've been in most breads all day. Only just started heavily engaging for a bit in this one and the last.
Disprove anything false they are using as talking points and back up with legitimate sources.
They will then bring up new talking points. Rinse/repeat until they realize they've be had.
It's a discussion. Don't turn it into an argument.
Let them lead, you follow. You bring up your position on what they have lead with, and back your position up with sources. Let them try to back theirs up with the same.
A lot of what they will have is "a source close to the person" blah blah, but no actual source.
Or things like the covington kids incident where so much was omitted, until the full source come out.
There are lots of ways to go about it.
Just don't be arrogant. Be polite, listen and maybe you may learn something from them at the same time. Share information. You may not always be right, but if you work together with the person you are conversing with and you are both rational, you may come to the same conclusion organically.
All day mind you. This isn't the first bread it has happened in.
Anyway frens
I'm out for now!