IMPATIENT FAGGOTS
Not in relatin to the 2010 indictment.
Wut? How are you comparing Stone to Assange?
Stone has nothing to do with Assange or wikileaks. Obviously, you haven't read his indictment or any other related papers. stone was accused of trying to contact Assange about the dissemination of the emails. Has nothing to do with actually taking the emails or publishing them. Assange did not hack the server. He merely published what was given to him. In this case, that is not illegal. However, in 2010 Assange did try to asist in the hack, therefore the 2010 indictment against him are legit.
Stone did not actualy contat Assange, nor did Potus ask him to. Stone is only guilty of being an idiot.
Hope this clears it up for you.