Anonymous ID: 70cb41 April 18, 2019, 7:23 a.m. No.6224072   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4177

>>6223947 lb

They clearly do not know the law. Barr was correct when he said as a publisher, it was not a crime for Assange to publish the emails because he was not involved in their hacking. Mueller actually exonerated Assange for the emails leaks.

Anonymous ID: 70cb41 April 18, 2019, 7:29 a.m. No.6224179   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4340

>>6224102

Maybe it will come out that Mueller didn't do any real investigation towards the email hack since he didn't interview any of the parties involved, ie: DNC, Assange, etc. Could be used to prove Mueller's investigation was not thorough and was only to try and frame Potus.

Anonymous ID: 70cb41 April 18, 2019, 7:32 a.m. No.6224236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6224177

I know what he (Barr) was referencing. I disagree with other anon stating Barr did not clear WL and Assange. He actually did, as far as the email hack goes. But then we are not talking about the 2010 indictments in the pressser.

Anonymous ID: 70cb41 April 18, 2019, 7:35 a.m. No.6224282   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6224226

>Since the DNC never submitted the servers to FBI forensic investigators, the Mueller report could not possibly determine whether the servers were hacked by Russia

And yet, that's exactly what they concluded. Hopefully, this will be used to further prove Mueller was a partisan hack.