>>6232464

Writing from home; apparently my attempt was considered so pitiful it's not even being acknowledged as an attempt

>>6228291 pg 300-310, technically touching on about 299 to 312 but mostly "F:"

I totally get if someone thinks I my summarization skills are inadequate, but if you want my help can you tell me what I'm missing? Or will you only include sycophantic spin? The pages I read, taken out of context, say what I summarized them as.

Can some approved Anon redo 301-310, so I can compare my input with the more palatable version? I'd like to understand what went wrong here.

>>6233813

last I looked, the 302's, et al, have not been released; only the report Mueller made by reading them all.

News articles and tweets, of course, can be located but I believe they comprise an incredibly small portion of the whole.

too slow. It's like

>>6234066

says.