Page 47

posted: "ANNOUNCE: WikiLeaks has decided to issue a

180

US$20k reward for information leading to conviction for the murder ofDNC staffer Seth Rich. " Likewise, on August 25, 2016, Assange was asked in an interview, "Why are you so interested in Seth Rich's killer?" and responded, "We ' re very interested in anything that might be a threat to alleged Wikileaks sources." The interviewer responded to Assange's statement by commenting, "I know you don't want to reveal your source, but it certainly sounds like you're suggesting a man who leaked information to WikiLeaks was then murdered ." Assange replied, "If there's someone who's potentially connected to our publication, and that person has been murdered….

But RM never calls on JA.

>>6226007

Vol 2 Page 84

On the evening of June 14, 2017, the Washington Post published an article stating that the 561

Special Counsel was investigating wheth er the President had attempted to obstructjustice . This was the first public report that the President himself was under investigation by the Special

562

Counsel ' s Office, and cabl e news networks quickly picked up on the report . The Post story

stated that the Special Counse l was interv iewing intelligence community leaders , including Coats

and Rogers , about what the President had asked them to do in response to Corney ' s March 20,

2017 testimony ; that the inquiry into obstruction marked "a major turning point" in the

investigation ; and that while "Trump had received private assuranc es from then-FBI Director

James B. Corney starting in January that he was not personally under investigation ," "[o]fficials

563

Presid ent called McGahn on McGahn ' s personal cell phone and th ey spoke for about 15

say that changed shortly after Corney's firing.

Comey - leaking

CNN WAPO - Collusion with JC and many others.

They are need to be locked up!

Brennan is not mentioned at all in Mueller report.

>>6226142

Exactly - the fact that Brennan isn’t mentioned - he should lawyer up top to bottom.

Vol 1 p 156

Bannon vs Prince

The conflicting accounts provided by Bannon and Prince could not be independently clarified by reviewing their communications, because neither one was able to produce any of the messages they exchanged in the time period surrounding the Seychelles meeting. Prince's phone contained no text messages prior to March 2017, though provider records indicate that he and Bannon exchanged dozens of messages. 1094 Prince denied deleting any messages but claimed he did not know why the re were no messages on his device before March 2017. 1095 Bannon's devices similarly contained no messages in the relevant time period, and Bannon also stated he did not know why messages did not appear on his device. 1096 Bannon told the Office that, during both the months before and after the Seychelles meeting, he regularly used his personal Blackberry and personal email for work-related communications (including those with Prince) , and he took no steps to preserve these work communications.