Anonymous ID: be0271 April 18, 2019, 11:46 a.m. No.6227347   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7360 >>7385 >>7395 >>7448 >>7653 >>7707 >>7756

It's "slow but sure" anons.

I 'll put my 10 pages all together at the end for the collection.l

page 232

 

Using sophistry to try to "win"

Mis-represents the contention of POTUS DJT associates that POTUS had no business with Russia as "party line"

That's a mischaracterization and counts as a way to appear to "defeat" one's enemy without actually doing it

 

The report author catalogs the times those associated with POTUS DJT pulled back from association with Russians once the allegations became known.

^^^^

This would be normal for someone who was afraid of the motives of the SC; as it has been shown POTUS DJT was; He did not minimize the power of the SC;

Someone who knows they are innocent yet knows the FBI is out to get them [cf case of Aaron Swartz] would show prudence in staying as far away as possible from any perception of "collusion with Russia" once the accusation was known

 

Proves nothing.

 

Where did the Mueller investigation crew get the idea that it was Russia behind the emails leaks!

From an announcement by the federal [small "F"] the day after the emails were received by Wikileaks!

So we've got DHS implicated. Only specific officials

Digg on "Director of National Intelligence on Election Security DHS"

?

(No surprise since they are often "in on" the FF?)

footnote 50 see image

Anonymous ID: be0271 April 18, 2019, 11:50 a.m. No.6227395   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6227347

Only specific officials ?

Only specific officials at the DHS

Should have had a question mark!

Will attempt to do a dig on that person or persons once I'm done ?

Anonymous ID: be0271 April 18, 2019, 11:54 a.m. No.6227448   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7457

>>6227347

>>6227360

>>6227385

I am going to infer that they knew Wikileaks received the emails that day because Seth Rich and others were under surveillance.

So…. DHS made the "federal" [small f] announcement the very next day that is was "Russia"

Well how did they know?

They didn't.

Mostly because it wasn't. As Assange attests and what is logical from the forensic analysis.

Anonymous ID: be0271 April 18, 2019, 12:11 p.m. No.6227653   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7706 >>7802

>>6227347

232b

 

Podesta chimes in soon after the DHS claimed the hacking was from the Russians, to state the FBI was investigating the RUSSIAN hack.

 

If you notice the footnotes all cite weak or compromised alleged sources.

Anonymous ID: be0271 April 18, 2019, 12:22 p.m. No.6227783   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7814

>>6227706

Did it again.

Ebot, the FAKE AI thinks it's much smarter than it is.

Check your work ebot.

Your slip is showing.

Ebot is going insane now; double posting against me/.

don't you know, Ebot, you just draw attention to me when you do that.

You're not fooling anyone.