To impeach, all they need is votes.
Not reason.
Also, framers of the Constitution forsaw this.
That's why they can not arrest a sitting President.
Ingraham cut out right as dude was claiming POTUS told his subordinates to lie.
Who was that creep?
"MUELLER BLOCKADE END.
Fake investigations by committee members will not delay what is about to be unleashed.
Q"
yes.
page 235
Again, the writer of the report makes claims about an "assessment" which is opaque, not actual data.
The citation goes to the "Office of the Director of National Intelligence"
Who is that?
The report was in early Jan. while Hussain / Obama was still in charge; no detail on the report
"Russian Campaign to influence U.S. election 2016"
Buzzfeed published unverified accusations, which did not even rise to the level of crime [cf. Starr's investigation of Clinton's cock]
POTUS again vehemently denied.
Why is this even in the ^^^^ report.
Some are saying since Mueller knew he never could indict POTUS he did this to gather evidence for Impeachment.
Impeachment does not require proof of crime. Just votes.
But thats a dud too, since Senate is too Republican and with POTUS to get the number required for removal from office.
So, even if you had 'Impeachment" it would lead to another nothing-burger.
More hot air that shouldn't have been included in the report:
Trump felt the accusations regarding Russia would ruin his Presidency.
Well, why not? Why is that of note? Is that a crime? Is it something that made his accusers feel good, that they had succeeded in perhaps ruining his Presidency.
So far, Mueller report is a true Nothing Burger as stated by CNN Media Worker caught off-guard on recording.
So quick to claim it's debunked
Must've hit a nerve.
Didn't debunk it at all.
Remember "Debunk" is a code / trigger word used by people who read Snopes.