While I definitely agree with your sentiment, your approach is faulty. Sexually dimorphic secondary sex characteristics aren't absolutes, like most human characteristics they aren't distributed in such a way that one or five of them are definitive proof of a person's sex. You're basically trying to use Trannygate methodology to disprove Trannygate. It simply doesn't work that way. Hips, sdams apples, skullshape, 2D4D ratios, torso length, fat distribution, musculature, etc are not singularly capable of identifying sex, they share partially overlapping distribution between sexes. Cherry picking like that ignores not only the few passing trannies in the world and why they pass, but also narrow-assed women, gynecomastic men, mustachioed black grandmas, you get the picture.