>>6235738 (LB)
That's my point. They're going to try, but they still need some evidence.
They think that evidence is lying in wait in the unredacted parts of
the Mueller report (and probably the other stuff we've been waiting on,
TBH). The trap is set - they're going to demand their own doom and
Trump will deliver it gladly.
They will. The Judas goats are already working it. NP no longer controls
the party. The trio do.
Exactly. Kek!
Because somebody posted a file hash in a tweet, or a picture of a tweet.
It's not like the hash hasn't been public since the Q post.
How does that mean anything?
>Here is what Sater says to Michael Cohen, his old childhood buddy:
Who else was copied on the email? Russians?
Is Bill posting again to YT regularly? He was gone for quite a while
and ETS tried to claim some responsibility for his absence, then he
was back but not on twatter.
Oh, and yes, ETS is a tool.
Huh, looks like he's back on twatter, too.
He is back on twatter as well (just checked) so it must be, unless someone
took over his account. He was big on exposing ETS, though I don't think
he actually figured everything out.
Employs cold reading techniques. Deletes posts frequently so that "misses" are
forgotten or unsearchable. The fuckery with his latest name change was too
much. As soon as people figured out what he did, he changed it to something
that wouldn't show up in searches.
I was following him before that. The "help find Bill Smith" stuff was annoying. He's
a dude on YT and twatter that posts interesting shit, but just a dude. There's lots
of them. Some better than others.
Uh huh, still a big ??? in the middle there.
Uh huh, so some random guy posting on a chat board largely consisting of
hard-core conspiracy theorists has figured out a way to get not only the US
military to do his bidding by spending more money on some unknown and/or
unnamed companies to make more money while also pumping up unknown
and/or unnamed stocks to also favor "their" pocketbooks. Yeah, like I said,
still got a big ??? in there. Lurk moar.
>and that stupid 5G apparently POTUS is in support of it
Because it will revolutionize our ability to communicate with each other.
It's not going to bake your jewels. That's a myth dreamed up by the same
types that said every other form of communcations were going to do
the same thing over all of history.
The actual problems with 5G aren't even remotely close the the health
effects of the very low power signals themselves. It's what they can
do with them that could be a problem.
Electromagnetic radiation, just like every other signal used in every other
form of communication we've been using for decades.
Because they don't need to? You're one of those types that needs someone
to solve every problem, percieved or otherwise, in the world for you, right?