>>6235785 (LB)

No…. Again, we are talking about protection and control and todays electrical systems are highly sensitive to things like shorts and ground faults. Only way is if you have a connection that is not properly tightened and it just arcs away until the heat buildup is so great that it ignites or causes an arc flash to occur. To time an event like that to occur when the building was empty and work was finished for the day would be HIGHLY improbable. The fire was not started by an electrical fault. That is just a convenient explanation as the vast majority of the population consider electricity to be some kind of magic and they really have no idea how it works or really, what it is….

>>6235956

Let us not forget EO.. Ethelene oxide….It`s what they use in atomic bombs to start the reaction.

https://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/694

>>6236034

Thermite would not burn down the entire structure. The roof and support beams were wood. The building itself was made from stone hence why it took 100 years to build.

>>6236081

I have seen the footage and it is curious. Seems there was a figure at the base of the spire and there was a flash the there was the footage of a figure walking quickly across the front of the building when it was already burning posted last bread if I am not mistaken. HAve to consider this, however. According to the building architech, the wood was fire proofed and 800 year old oak timbers would not burn up like dry poplar unless there was a massive amount of heat to start the fire IMHO.

>>6235997

Because a photograph is someones art.. And the watermark names the artist…. And if your going to use their image without their permission, at least give them creds for the image itself… Then open yourself to a lawsuit for unauthorized use of a copyrite image…

A shit post just because…