Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 10:39 p.m. No.6236075   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6091

>>6236054

Never sacrifice your art for fear of word of mouth.

Watermarks are ugly and draw attention away from the photograph.

If your photos are good, people will remember your name and spread it for you. Anything else is faggotry.

Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 10:44 p.m. No.6236111   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6131

>>6236091

If your work can be stolen, you have more to learn and more to create.

Sometimes, getting your shit stolen is a good thing.

It's all a matter of attitude.

Copyright says, you can make a hit, and dominate it forever and block everybody else from building directly off of it.

It's an individualist concept.

We're all in this together.

Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 10:50 p.m. No.6236164   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6176

>>6236154

I'm looking at how major companies have extended the life of copyright way beyond the original scope of the law. Like Disney for example. And look at the state of their movies. They're absolutely garbage with the exception of some marvel movies.

Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 11:03 p.m. No.6236252   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6278

>>6236228

Photographers can obviously do what they want to their photographs. If their art is whoring out their photography skills, then in my opinion, their photography isn't very good. Their business is good.

Culture cannot thrive when it is strangled by copyright.

Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 11:05 p.m. No.6236269   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6279

>>6236253

Can y'all imagine if filmmakers had the freedom to flesh out the Star Wars universe like we have the freedom to play with Pepe?

Now can you imagine all film universes with the same openness?

Now can you imagine all art venues with that openness to participate?

And with the internet to share it all to boot.

Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 11:09 p.m. No.6236311   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6350

>>6236278

They can claim the fucking image!

Just like I can erase their watermark if it's easy enough to do.

Just like they can splurge their watermark over their actual subject in frame if they choose to.

That's not under debate.

No shit. Fuck this convo.

Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 11:31 p.m. No.6236438   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6486

>>6236422

>>6236414

It rallies everybody on the side of prosperity and patriotism.

When I see the liberal left MSM shoot Trump, it's almost with self-loathing projection, not just their criminal projection. It's like the MSM knows who is left, who watches, where their hate of success comes from, and they accuse Trump of being those things.

People can't face it in themselves, so they get sold that it must be Trump. He's the only target left really.

Meanwhile Fakewood stars and musicians are falling or they're victims.

People can identify with victims because they're victims of the cabal, but they don't know that yet until they wake up.

I mean, someone on MSM today accused Trump of not being patrioticโ€ฆ seems like they could look at the camera, at the viewer, in a glance, and the viewer would goโ€ฆ wait, I'm not patriotic. But it doesn't happen. Always Trump Trump Trump until something clicks and they realize it's not Trump.

Anonymous ID: 697911 April 18, 2019, 11:34 p.m. No.6236458   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6236433

Would be funny if some puppet masters were flipped or controlled and some of the puppets didn't know what they were working toward.

That's why I thought AOC was /ourgirl/ because she seemed to be torpedoing the party.

She's attracting the youth, which is fine because Trump wants to go up against the Green New Deal, and the youth losing to reality would be a wake up call for some too.