Dinesh D'Souza
Verified account
@DineshDSouza
14m14 minutes ago
More
Trump is the most effective Republican president since Reagan. Look at what he’s accomplished, from tax reform to fixing the court to smashing ISIS. Is really believable that he’s the mercurial, incompetent figure that Mueller portrays? If so, give us more such incompetents!
Bill Mitchell
Verified account
@mitchellvii
6m6 minutes ago
More
Reliable insider reports are that #DeepState'rs are already turning on each other, looking to cut deals to save their own skins.
We are hearing about large numbers of indictments for #CrossfireHurricane.
Let's see what happens.
effin lag cant see half the images
dont know how faggot
Department of State
Verified account
@StateDept
2m2 minutes ago
More
.@SecPompeo and Acting Secretary of Defense Shanahan Co-Host U.S.-#Japan 2+2 at the Department of State.
u like this screenshot faggot
U.S. Army
Verified account
@USArmy
1m1 minute ago
More
What does your morning look like when you go to work? #ServeWithHonor #MeetYourArmy
@USArmyReserve photo by Sgt. 1st Class Brent C. Powell
cry about this sc troll haha
CSPAN
Verified account
@cspan
3m3 minutes ago
More
#OnThisDay 1995: President @BillClinton on Oklahoma City Bombing: "It was an act of cowardice, and it was evil. The United States will not tolerate it. And I will not allow the people of this country to be intimidated by evil cowards."
Full video here: http://cs.pn/1lRmBc9
https://www.thedailybeast.com/mueller-report-julian-assange-smeared-seth-rich-to-cover-for-russians?source=twitter&via=desktop
Julian Assange repeatedly blamed Seth Rich, the murdered DNC staffer, for Russia’s leaks. The Mueller report shows that Assange was lying from the start.
Kevin Poulsen
04.18.19 8:57 PM ET
Julian Assange not only knew that a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer wasn’t his source for thousands of hacked party emails, he was in active contact with his real sources in Russia’s GRU months after Seth Rich’s death. At the same time he was publicly working to shift blame onto the slain staffer “to obscure the source of the materials he was releasing,” Special Counsel Robert Mueller asserts in his final report on Russia’s role in the 2016 presidential election.
“After the U.S. intelligence community publicly announced its assessment that Russia was behind the hacking operation, Assange continued to deny that the Clinton materials released by WikiLeaks had come from Russian hacking,” the report reads. “According to media reports, Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”
Thursday’s long-anticipated release adds new details about Assange’s interactions with the officers in Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate. Still, it leaves one question unanswered: Why was Assange so determined to exonerate the Russian intelligence agents who gave him the material?
As laid out by Mueller, Assange’s involvement in Russia’s election interference began with a June 14, 2016 direct message to WikiLeaks’ Twitter account from “DC Leaks,” one of the false fronts created by the Russians to launder their hacked material.
“You announced your organization was preparing to publish more Hillary's emails,” the message read, according to Mueller’s report. “We are ready to support you. We have some sensitive information too, in particular, her financial documents. Let's do it together. What do you think about publishing our info at the same moment? Thank you.”
A week later, WikiLeaks reached out to a second GRU persona, Guccifer 2.0, and pitched WikiLeaks as the best outlet for the hacked material. On July 14, 2016, GRU officers used a Guccifer 2.0 email address to send WikiLeaks an encrypted one-gigabyte file named “wk dnc link I .txt.gpg.” Assange confirmed receipt, and on July 22 he published 20,000 DNC emails stolen during the GRU’s breach.
By then, it was no secret where the documents came from. The computer security firm CrowdStrike had already published its technical report on the DNC breach, which laid out a trail leading directly to Moscow and the GRU. Analysts at ThreatConnect independently presented evidence that Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks were fictional creations of that agency.