If Mueller met with POTUS and exonerated him, and protected the deep state and was a blockade; he is neither a white hat or a black hat.

Grey Hat

>>6243836

>>6243733

I don't think this is notable, it's a bunch of nonsense and has no meaning; nor has the "Qclock" been confirmed by Q ever.

>>6243907

>met with POTUS the day before he became SC

>marine

>exonerated POTUS

then

>blockade

>kept the investigation going

>protected deepstate

>>6243964

>Q has confirmed the clock.

stfu clocknigger, it's hilarious at this point

>>6244042

it was march 19th you retard

>>6244095

>>6244103

the last two clocks were posted in march 27th, one's date was 27, the other was 19. since it was posted AFTER the others in february, it's march you stupid boomers

>>6244135

The watch's date was March 19th

>Does no one not notice the date on the watch???

We did, when it was posted

>Wow…some of you people are slipping!

<reddit spacing boomer

>It's 4:50.

<reddit spacing boomer

>Look…at…the…date!!!

<reddit spacing boomer

>>6244142

anon, that info could've come from anywhere ffs

the graphic Q replied to had the tweet in it.

>>6244187

see: >>6244119

>am I missing something?

context

your theory is valid, but saying anons missed something like a bitch is hilarious

>>6244215

>Hey its only gotta be close!!!

No, a proof is a proof, the rest are theories.

>>6244235

it was after the 2nd, and before the 27th; not from the future.

>>6244247

>newbs

It's newfag, nigger.

Try again next bread.

>>6244232

I'm not saying it's not notable like the other anon, I'm just saying Q noted the GRAPHIC the anon made, the account has posted Q related shit before.

It's not an official white house account, it posts the official schedule which the pool gets.

>>6244300

>>>6244119, >>6244214 some Anons dispute the previous two notables: Mar 19 not Apr 19?

Baker, I'm not disputing it, was just pointing out we didn't miss anything

I'd remove if you can.