dChan
Anonymous ID: c90c86 April 19, 2019, 2:18 p.m. No.6243875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3897

>>6243691

>I am so confused why Session recused himself

That's the easy part. Sessions was forced to recuse or face unprecedented accusations and investigations. He was weak knee-ed and buckled. Rr also appealed to his sense of right and wrong and made it seem like Sessions was somehow involved in the russian cover-up.

Why Mueller met with Potus day before is the biggy. Was it before Potus found out a SC was to be named? What is the exact timing of it all?

If Potus already knew about Mueller then Mueller and Rr told Potus the investigation was about him, only RUssian interference and possible campaign members involved. Knowing Potus, he would agree to investiagte anyone that did wrong. But they lied to him.

If Potus did not know at that time about the SCO, then Potus had asked them there to get their opinions on a new AG. That's my belief. Hopefully, we will all find out the truth someday.

Anonymous ID: c90c86 April 19, 2019, 2:47 p.m. No.6244226   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4374

>>6244142

Q has used many different twitter accounts to send a message. Doesn't verify any of them. My point still stands, if it was a legitamit WH account, it would be verified.

 

>>6244143

>It is an anon

Agreed

>And its posted as a marker and Q proof

Disagree. Not a Q proof. It means nothing. There is no clear message there. It doesn't prove any specific event that is the standard for a Q proof. As for the 19th, that could be May or June 19th. It's a bullshit and not notable.

Anonymous ID: c90c86 April 19, 2019, 2:57 p.m. No.6244339   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6244288

Preaching to the choir, but I was talking about the one pic Q said was a proof. My whole point was that anons trying to use Potus Schedule again today are wrong because there is no event associated with it, therefore is not a proof of anything that happened. Additionally, the 19th could be any month in the future.