Whether it's technically a Q proof or not, it's definitely pertinent.
**Assange testimony or statement, something evidenciary
More shills than usual today?
What about Rosenstein?
I don't know, anon. I've always considered "Flipped Mueller" to entail that Mueller was going through the motions of what his Deep State masters expected of him, I.e., obstructing Trump and trying to carve a path to getting him out of office, but that it was understood that the greater Trump+ plan was to let it play it out and use it to advantage later, requiring either Mueller's direct cooperation or Rosenstein's cooperation in steering Mueller accordingly.
Basically, I always thought that the plan would have to entail making the Deep State think that Mueller was doing what they wanted while the whole operation had in fact been somewhat "co-opted" by Trump+.
I'm certainly open to it not being true and I definitely do not encourage anyone to believe it, I just don't really think that anything we've seen since MegaAnon first floated the idea has definitively disproved it.