Anonymous ID: 70f712 April 19, 2019, 4:27 p.m. No.6245427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5444 >>5447 >>5462 >>5586 >>5864

Anons/Baker

 

Maybe we're looking at the redacted portion all wrong! Perhaps we need to look at the "WHO", who are they trying to get off the hook? The D's are trying to get AG Barr to break the law, what would happen if the HOM were exposed? They have 96% of the report, if they were to get what they want, you know they're going to turn right around and accuse Barr of breaking the law.

Anonymous ID: 70f712 April 19, 2019, 4:39 p.m. No.6245578   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6245462

Redactions are generally for the purposes of Grand Jury, ongoing criminal procedings, witness protections, source & methods and if any is revealed, it jams up the AG (breaking the law), the other. Lawfag can better explain what happens when GJ seals are illegally broken. Whoever is indicted can get off and within that case alone it will have a ripple effect.

Anonymous ID: 70f712 April 19, 2019, 4:52 p.m. No.6245769   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6245524

Man, I wonder what legal recourse we the people have like charging them with fraud, disbarment and whatever else we can to keep this shit from happening again. Wonder where all our lawfags went, they use to hang with us in evening board.