dChan
Anonymous ID: bb747d April 19, 2019, 6:22 p.m. No.6246775   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6794 >>6800 >>6804 >>6850 >>7074 >>7092

@45_Schedule a LARP account?

 

WTF, over? Why did Q reference this as a marker? There is no evidence that this is a legitimate twatter account. Every indication is that this account is a LARP.

  • No one within POTUS administration, government, or Congress/Senate follows it.

  • It joined Twatter in March, same month that Q referenced it.

 

WTF, over?

 

Q said no outside comms ever

Anonymous ID: bb747d April 19, 2019, 6:28 p.m. No.6246840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6844 >>6868 >>7047 >>7151 >>7440

@45_Schedule a LARP account?

 

Why did Q reference this as a marker? There is no evidence that this is a legitimate twatter account. Every indication is that this account is a LARP.

 

  • No one within POTUS administration, government, or Congress/Senate follows it.

  • It joined Twatter in March, same month that Q referenced it.

 

WTF, over?

 

Q said no outside comms ever

Anonymous ID: bb747d April 19, 2019, 6:39 p.m. No.6247004   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7041 >>7085

>>6246898

Not a shill. Been digging for about 15 months now. Just don't understand how Q could confirm a marker on a fake twatter account. The 4:50 proof from today was from the same account. See a pattern Anon?

Anonymous ID: bb747d April 19, 2019, 6:43 p.m. No.6247057   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7073 >>7171

>>6247023

I'm just doing my due diligence on this one. Everything I've seen on this account looks larpy. I'm hoping someone can clear this up or Q will provide confirmation that we should trust this source.

Anonymous ID: bb747d April 19, 2019, 6:46 p.m. No.6247101   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6247047

yes, I was one of the first anons to make a connection with @45_schedule, but when I look closer. it just looks larpy. take a look around for yourself. Look at who follows it from government, POTUS team, etc. No one. It's a fake account, yet we keep trusting it like it's POTUS himself.

 

https://twitter.com/45_Schedule