Anonymous ID: 51ce4d April 19, 2019, 11:56 p.m. No.6249893   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9940 >>0178 >>0281 >>0381 >>0429 >>0468

https://www.rt.com/usa/457051-militia-arrests-migrants-border-patrol/

KNOW your POWERS of ARREST.

((they)) want you to back off the immigrants by instilling fear BUT know this: (Anyone find the state legislation word for word, PDF?):

(Wiki) United States

 

In the United States a private person may arrest another without a warrant, for a crime occurring in their presence. For which crimes this is permitted may vary state by state.[77]

Common law

 

Most states have codified the common law rule that a warrantless arrest may be made by a private person for a felony, misdemeanor or "breach of peace".[78] "Breach of peace" covers a multitude of violations in which the Supreme Court has included a misdemeanor seatbelt violation punishable only by a fine. The term historically included theft, "nightwalking", prostitution and playing card and dice games.[79]

State statutes

 

California Penal Code section 837 is a good example of this codification:

 

837. A private person may arrest another:

 

For a public offense committed or attempted in his/her presence.

When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in his/her presence.

When a felony has been in fact committed, and he or she has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it.

 

"Public offense" is read similarly as breach of peace in this case and includes felonies, misdemeanors and infractions.[80][81] Note that there is generally no provision for an investigative detention by a private person under the law. With certain exceptions (see below) an arrest must be made. "Holding them until the police get there", is simply a form of arrest. The officer is accepting the arrest and processing the prisoner on behalf of the private person.[82]

 

In the case of felonies, a private person may make an arrest for a felony occurring outside their presence but the rule is that a felony must have, in fact, been committed. For example, imagine a suspect has been seen on surveillance video vandalizing a building to the extent that the arrestor believes it rises to a felony due to the damage. If they find the suspect and make the arrest but it later turns out that it was misdemeanor damage, the arrestor is liable for false arrest because a felony had not, in fact, been committed.[citation needed]

 

Because most states have codified their arrest laws, there are many variations. For example, in Pennsylvania, the courts have been clear that a citizen cannot make an arrest for a "summary offense".[83] In North Carolina, there is no de jure "citizens' arrest". Although it is essentially the same, North Carolina law refers to it as a "detention".[84]

 

Other states seem to allow only arrests in cases of felonies but court decisions have ruled more broadly. For example in Virginia, the statute appears to only permit warrantless arrests by officers listed in the Code.[85] However Virginia courts have upheld warrantless arrests by citizens for breach of the peace misdemeanors.[86]

Use of force

 

In general, a private person is justified in using non-deadly force upon another if they reasonably believe that: (1) such other person is committing a felony, or a misdemeanor amounting to a breach of the peace; and (2) the force used is necessary to prevent further commission of the offense and to apprehend the offender. The force must be reasonable under the circumstances to restrain the individual arrested. This includes the nature of the offense and the amount of force required to overcome resistance.[87][88]

Anonymous ID: 51ce4d April 20, 2019, 12:30 a.m. No.6250065   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0071 >>0079 >>0206

Rod Rosenstein appointed Muller didn't he?

from 18th May 2017 RT News https://www.rt.com/usa/388757-robert-mueller-special-counsel-russia-investigation/

 

“In my capacity as acting Attorney General, I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a Special Counsel to assume responsibility for this matter,” Rosenstein said in a DOJ statement. “My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted. I have made no such determination. What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances, the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command.”

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/375478974/Rosenstein-Instructions-Authorizing-Mueller-Investigation#download&from_embed :

 

August 2017 Rosenstein Instructions Authorizing Mueller Investigation Letter, EXPLICIT instruction : (summary From Scribd) "August 22nd, 2017 letter from Asst. Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to Special Counsel Robert Mueller with explicit instructions of how to proceed with investigation. Worth noting this letter follows the IG discoveries of internal communications between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page highlighting a specific intent of the DOJ and FBI to conduct surveillance on Presidential Candidate and President-Elect Donald Trump."

 

Abuse of Power or Unlawful Investigation "U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III appears to have caught on to an explosive issue. In building the case against Paul Manafort, special counsel Robert Mueller’s team used the pre-existing FISA Title-1 warrant that was originally applied to U.S. person Carter Page and the Trump campaign. Under normal criminal investigation any search warrant or surveillance warrant would normally proceed through U.S. courts, under Title-3, where the Mueller team would need to show probable cause for a warrant. However, by using the Title-1 warrant from the FBI counterintelligence operation, as extended by AAG Rod Rosenstein, Robert Mueller was able to use far more intrusive and unchecked searches and seizures for his criminal probe. The media, and broad media-consumption public, are currently unaware the Mueller probe was simply a continuance of the 2016 FBI counterintelligence operation. Most people think the special counsel investigation is a separate issue. It’s not. However, in addition to a scathing rebuke of the underlying prosecutorial premise, ie. Mueller trying to keep the originating structure hidden, Judge Ellis demanded today that Mueller unredact the August 2, 2017, instructions from AAG Rosenstein. That removal will expose the use of the FISA Title-1 warrant use that drove the investigative origin."

 

Getting bored of the PDFs, what about their emails to and from Rosenstein, WHO pushed HIM for all this nonsense?

Anonymous ID: 51ce4d April 20, 2019, 1:19 a.m. No.6250268   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0278

>>6250063

Rosenstein (the Tax Man, who's wife Linda Barsoomian who according to wiki, has during her 24 years of law practice, as a government attorney, defended cases for Bill Clinton and Colin Powell, various Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases, and the FBI's "Carnivore" surveillance system, which monitors and captures e-mail.[78][79]") tried to use Mueller,(who is a professor of cyber-security I might

add) to bring Trump house down…. is Mueller one of the good 'guise'?

Am I correct?

 

Did you know? Ken Starr became a member of the Delta Phi Epsilon Fraternity, which was founded by an American Jesuit Catholic Priest.

Anonymous ID: 51ce4d April 20, 2019, 2:02 a.m. No.6250423   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6250249

Maybe the investigations for Whitewater Clinton Scandal and the Vince Foster 'suicide' need to/will be reopened?

Kenneth Starr and Robert Ray were Independent Counsels then 1994 - 2001

 

Dems tried to throw Kavanaugh under the bus (I guess he was blackmailed into keeping Shtum on Foster case) : https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/kavanaugh-confirmation-starr-vince-foster-842530

Anonymous ID: 51ce4d April 20, 2019, 2:32 a.m. No.6250539   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Check your states Penal law for Citizens Arrest and follow it by the letter….for example, N.Y. Penal Law §35.30(4) :

 

A private person acting on his or her own account may use physical force, other than deadly physical force, upon another person when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to effect an arrest or to prevent the escape from custody of a person whom he or she reasonably believes to have committed an offense and who in fact has committed such offense; and may use deadly physical force for such purpose when he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to:

 

(a) Defend himself, herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force; or

 

(b) Effect the arrest of a person who has committed murder, manslaughter in the first degree, robbery, forcible rape or forcible criminal sexual act and who is in immediate flight therefrom.

source: http://lawandthemultiverse.com/2011/03/07/superheroes-and-citizens-arrest/

 

In relation to scaremongering about this power, just make sure you KNOW or BELIEVE they have committed an offence and not merely suspected (backed up by your observations and any evidence).

https://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Citizen%27s-Arrest