>>6249703 (LB)
>He is part of a conspiracy to overthrow a duly elected President.
There's no evidence of that. In fact, his name is never really mentioned
in regards to the coup itself. Even Q doesn't (the 2 JCs are Clapper and
Carlin).
>Last time I checked that is called Treason!
Check again. Treason is defined in the Constitution.
No you didn't. You gave me conjecture. Do you not know the difference?
In fact, you even said "in my book," which means your opinion. Read the
fucking Constitution - I actually told you to do that, but you ignored my advice.
It's in plain English.
It's called being explicity. Technically, it was only an attempted coup.
They didn't succeed after all.
Well, if there aren't any that supports my point. You're not that
bright, are you?
Regardless, your opinion that he was part of the attempt does not
amount to evidence. You don't get to talk about anybody being
stupid if you can't even understand that distinction.
>But I was utterly shocked by Comey's declination to prosecute
Comey wasn't the one that declined to prosecute. He was FBI. FBI does
not prosecute. They're literally the cops. Yeah, he gave that press conference,
but the decision not to prosecute was still legally Lynch's. That was the
pea under the thimble maneuver she pulled.
>He gave all the evidence against Hillary and declined to prosecute.
Get it into your heads, the FBI does not prosecute. The attorneys in the DoJ
do. Mueller as SC was a prosecutor.
DU is an expensive as fuck private university, too.
Post what cap? The Constitution? Look it up yourself you dumbass. If you haven't
already read it neck yourself. You have no business discussing any of this.
It's a bot, anon.