>>6250659 (pb) vid of ND fire

>>6250810 (pb) water makes magnesium burn hotter

>>6250866 (pb) my comments (see below)

>>6250897 (pb) Magnesium basics

>>6250968 (pb) Magnesium in context PToE

>>6250979 (pb) POTUS: 'flying water tankers'

My earlier speculation:

1. I wonder if this explains POTUS' tweet suggesting 'flying water tanks' (or however he phrased it). Was POTUS trolling Macron & the other perpetrators?

1. Was the arsonists' plan designed to trick those who wanted to save the Cathedral into contributing to its destruction by adding water to a magnesium fire?

——

Thanks to anons for digging; I did some digging too. First, I'll post some more detailed info re: magnesium (including some mark-ups on things I found interesting.

(see pics attached)

Following this, I'll post something (potentially) much more interesting based on magnesium being a key component in formation of new STARS (as related to several Q drops).

>>6251630

Theory-under-consideration: White hats had very advanced foreknowledge of ND Cathedral fire, and prepared as best they could to minimize harm. Keep in mind:

• The CROWN OF THORNS was saved

• many (/most) other precious relics: SAVED

• statues / sculptures / priceless artifacts: SAVED

• windows may have been removed (/preserved)

• NO LIVES were lost

• Cathedral still stands (can be successfully restored)

• attempt to start a religious war Muslims/Christians: FAILED

• culprits further implicated themselves by a (failed) 9/11 repeat.

• media's pre-written script ("DESTROYED") exposes them too (e.g. BBC / Building 7) as co-conspirators?

This will draw heavy shilling, if I'm right. That's not to discount legitimate disagreement/ criticism, which is welcome.

(see pics… form your own opinion)

>>6251645

Further Supplementation of above theory.

The content below was repeatedly nominated as Notable by anons, and repeatedly swept under the carpet by the bakers at the time.

Anons can judge for themselves, and hopefully baker(s) will now give these digs their due.

>>6251957

hurry and tell the baker so he doesn't include it in the notables…

oh wait… he's dutifully ignoring it, despite his long list of other items, and the fact that the Notre Dame posts are one of only three of four anon-nominated notables in the bread.

maybe he'll have room for another Bongino tweet notable now…

>>6252025

anons can explore all they want.

The part that I've presented isn't in need of exploration, but of recognition as NOTABLE by a non-comped baker.

"Notable"

"Notable AF"

"brilliant"

'agree notable"

these are just some comments from legit anons.

Beware of the leaven of the Pharisee Baker

>>6252086

true… just ask the arsonists who tried (and failed) to burn down Notre Dame bc of muh "holy" talmud getting bonfired by the French 777 years earlier.