>This guy has done some decent work on California fires
This guy is a very special kind of retard. Exhibit A: this video about flat earth and why the sky is blue.
So it's no surprise that he thinks DEWs were involved in the Cali fires.
>This guy has done some decent work on California fires
This guy is a very special kind of retard. Exhibit A: this video about flat earth and why the sky is blue.
So it's no surprise that he thinks DEWs were involved in the Cali fires.
You can plainly see that it's not the same symbol.
Hope Hicks.
>I'm no math genius, but even I can see that 100,000 is too small a sample size to make a significant statistical inference on a population of 320,000,000.
100,000 is plenty. But if you are intentionally skewing the polls (or just making them up) then sample size doesn't really matter.