The first image in post
>>6251617 (pb)
>> that then led to this one
>>6251656 (pb)
is just too easy to debunk and actually put some facts to it.
A simple tineye search gives everything you need to know.
Just look at the file name for the first occurrence of that image:
wiki/File:Tanit-carthage.jpg
The stone carving is a punic stela depicting Tanit.
The Phoenician religion, which the people from Carthage had brought along with them, comprised a few gory aspects. In times of need the Carthaginians sacrificed children to the gods. The stela depicted here is typical of the Tophet, the children’s burial site. Usually, the headstones feature the sign of Tanit, a stylized female figure with uplifted arms. Besides these, we find depictions of sacrificial animals and ritual symbols, like the raised praying hand. As a rule, the headstones are dedicated to Tanit and her husband Baal Hammon, the god supreme. The inscriptions are in Punic, a variant of the Phoenician script.
These stones were discovered in Carthage in 1817 by the Dutch engineer Jean Emile Humbert (1771-1839). They were the first indication of the location of the city of Carthage in ancient times. The destruction by the Romans had been so radical that Carthage’s exact location had not been definitely established till then.
https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/punic-stela/eAGzqkqA7ABRTw
Therefore, the monstrosity on the Vanderbilt wall is a representation of Tanit.
No wonder Anderson's hair turned white.