>>6252118 (lb)

if it cures people, they would say it's toxic?

please excuse me for not trusting these people.

any ideas on which of their scientists just bought their degrees? and which actually had to pass courses?

>>6252165

I think that those of us who saw the impetents in tech take over, kind of know that they were already in the medical profession.

what did you mean by your comment?

Have you ever been told you need expensive daily treatments by a doctor with a foreign accent only to have different doctor, who is from your own area tell you to 'never go back' to that clinic?

obviously the medical profession is filled with fraudsters.

the public knows this now. you can't put pandora back in her box.

so what were you asking me about?