Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 7:16 a.m. No.6252180   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2189

>>6252049

>>6251422 1 Year ago: …does everybody…"

 

It means that this research done here has been supporting a Constitutional Sting Operation from the get-go, through transparent research for the public record.

 

and this anon is still in it to win it.

 

May the Lord bless our Patriots!

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 7:31 a.m. No.6252296   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6252190

 

KEK.

 

I find it very hard to digest the coincidence that the trump card is also the card you want to have in your hand during a high stakes game such as this.

 

AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE THAT CARD IN THEIR HAND!!!!

 

Can't make this shit up people.. Interesting times indeed.

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 7:39 a.m. No.6252355   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2580

>>6252334

 

controlling the clock is important in football. If you pass and miss, the clock stops.

 

If you keep rushing and get no penalties, you keep [their] defense in dissarray.

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 7:45 a.m. No.6252408   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2423 >>2521 >>2531

>>6252177

>there is a moral time for violence

 

No, there isn't.

 

Resorting to violence means you have no valid retort.

 

Defending life and liberty with terminal force is another thing altogether.

 

It's all about intent.

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 8:05 a.m. No.6252602   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2613 >>2664

>>6252531

 

You seem way more triggered at my response than I figured you'd get.

 

>Believe what you want, but violence is a part of this world and to ignore it is IMO stupid.

 

I never said ignore it ;)

Defending yourself with equal force is perfectly fine.

No "violence" necessary, because muh violence has a different intent than defense does.

 

>Not knowing how to judiciously apply it is also STUPID.

 

Getting into a conversation with slippery-slope words is infantile.

 

>Know when to apply it - IS morality!

 

No it isn't. Morality is recognizing that there is no place for "violence". Have you looked up the word violence? here:

 

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=violence

 

And you have the balls to call me stupid? go fuck yourself :D

 

>Defending life and liberty… - WTF do you think we are talking about?

 

See above, you're mis-characterizing your own intent here.

 

>We are not homicidal criminals and to imply such shows your moral and mental vacancy.

 

Your personal attacks suck too.

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 8:16 a.m. No.6252684   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2704 >>2714

>>6252664

 

Even with facts in your face you keep fucking going :)

 

you left out the part I bolded for you:

 

late 13c., "physical force used to inflict injury or damage," from Anglo-French and Old French violence (13c.), from Latin violentia "vehemence, impetuosity," from violentus "vehement, forcible,"

 

Go home operator.

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 8:19 a.m. No.6252715   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2770

>>6252704

 

Words matter.

 

The etymology of words matter. If you aren't an op, you need to learn that for your own benefit.

 

I suspect you are not an organic anon. Thanks for playing.

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 8:28 a.m. No.6252792   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2803 >>2810

>>6252613

 

I'm going to continue to maintain that it is wrong to violate anyone.

 

The historical use of the word violence implies violating another. Patriots do not violate things.

 

That is what etymology is. It is the historical context of a words meaning.

Anonymous ID: d70081 April 20, 2019, 8:32 a.m. No.6252832   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6252803

>You can't Defeat a Violent Immoral enemy by Kneeling in Peace

 

True, you do it by defending yourself, with terminal force, like I said before ;)

 

You can shove your muh voilence trigger up your own ass ;D