And a namefag too.
Who could have guessed.
(checked)
>can you edit the image?
Would if we could, baker.
Thanks for pushing thru anyway.
We'll keep working on it back here.
>Anything interesting you can parse from his ID hash?
kek, 'bout what you'd expect.
Stale memes, mostly the same copypasta
But the namefagging was new.
And he overtly pushes anons to leave QR for the external/alternative "board search" site
>Just from the dough
Yup, and bakers put it in there, with Anons okay.
What bakers and anons did NOT choose to put in the dough is the copypasta "PSA" you insist on spamming, where you associate us with MSM gotcha words while claiming to represent us in that.
Anons argued many times that you stop.
Yet you continue, which indicates either retard or shill.
We were asked what else we saw in your hash.
We reported what we saw:
namefagging and promoting an alternate site
It's for Anons to decide what that means
>you cut off the hash and post number for the top post in that graphic…
Gotcha, sorry about that.
Big hash history we posted shows it too but here's the corrected image linking namefagging to this "PSA" spam.
>its prob OG spammer
Yeah could be. We have a few different hashes doing this particular copypasta, as well as a few that appeared to work in teams on it, esp. when it was first rolled out.
But could be a well-meaning Anon too.
>It won’t be posted again…
Thank you, we'd appreciate that
We're a research group that prefers to let our work speak for us.
And that work is fact-based evidence of cabal crimes.
At the top of every bread we have a welcome statement, as well as a statement of purpose which serves as our violence disclaimer to the MSM.
These were worked out by Anons over many weeks to be a fair representation of how we work.
That said, you're welcome to post what you like.
But Anons will tear bullshit to shreds.
That's also how we work.
And spammed copypasta of any sort is bullshit.