Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 10:32 a.m. No.6253708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3709 >>3781 >>3806 >>3944 >>3999 >>4013

>>6252745 >>6252768 OB

 

To clarify.

 

In Q Post 3248, Q pointed at Q Post 3063 and then said (quoting from Q Post 3248) to focus on certain lines in Q Post 1828:

 

FOCUS HERE:

[NO NAME][MEDIA - [JB][JC] LEAKS—→POTUS Daily Brief/FBI]

Match?

Q

 

***

 

Note that Q Post 1828 also appeared embedded in Q Post 1829 with the additional remarks:

 

What assets (people) were placed (spy) in POTUS' campaign?

Why did the news cycle drop this investigation?

Think several.

What if those 'placed' are being investigated by BM?

Plants need water.

What if others 'placed' connect to….(future)

What if Nellie Ohr prev worked on the FARM?

The START (public justification to proceed (clean)).

Q

 

    • *

 

Also, this Anon recommends re-reading Q Post 3062 and Q Post 3063. Good check on theories.

 

Cheers, Anons.

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 10:46 a.m. No.6253806   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6253708

 

Q said:

 

FOCUS HERE:

 

[NO NAME][MEDIA - [JB][JC] LEAKS—→POTUS Daily Brief/FBI]

 

Match?

 

    • *

 

Match? Light a fire to smoke them out?

Might that refer to the CA forest fires? Notre dame cathedral?

 

Or match as in a tennis match? Ball is in whose court? Court.

 

Or match as in match-maker? Who might be singing – turning on fellow conspirator? Matches made in the swamp, bed fellows. Follow the wives (and husbands)?

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 11:03 a.m. No.6253944   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6253708 >>6253781

>>6253709 >>6253806 OB

 

Match?

 

Light a fire in the Swamp?

 

 

Swamps and Wildfires: A Dangerous Combination

https://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/natural-disasters/swamps-and-wildfires-dangerous-combination.htm

 

"Know your enemy" is a perfect motto for wildland firefighters. The brave souls who've chosen this line of work understand its many dangers. Forest fires are not their only source of trouble: One of the biggest challenges these men and women can face is an out-of-control peatland swamp fire. Don't let the standing water fool you: Bogs and swamps are fertile terrain for a tenacious, sneaky kind of inferno that smolders underground and might spend years lurking beneath the surface.

 

-

 

Pressure from above slowly drives peat deeper into the Earth, where it eventually becomes coal. And like that prized mining commodity, peat harbors a lot of trapped carbon from dead life forms. In fact, peat plays host to a third of all the carbon that's stored inside the world's soils. All this carbon renders the substance highly flammable. Even damp peat makes for good kindling when water makes up less than 55 percent of its total weight.

 

A spark at the surface might be all that's required to ignite the peat under a swamp or forest. Whereas living trees burst into licks of orange flame, peat catches fire in a less dramatic way: It smolders like a lit cigarette. Once they get started, peat fires move at a gradual pace, creeping along through the substrate. The slow burns have been known to last for years before getting extinguished. They can also reach the surface, setting some trees or bushes ablaze. It's not unheard-of for a peat fire to do exactly that and then retreat back underground, only to reappear later on. In 2014, seven Canadian peat fires caused surface-level damage and then went under before they resurfaced the following year.

 

Fires liberate the trapped carbon, sending it into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. This has the unfortunate effect of triggering longer dry seasons in places where peat bogs naturally occur, making them more likely to ignite. It's a nasty feedback loop — and a big contributor to our climate change problems.

 

What's more, smoke from these fires aggravates respiratory problems for those who inhale it. A 2015 outbreak of the bog burnings in southeast Asia led to dense, low-lying clouds of haze. We don't know how many deaths this caused, but one team of researchers came up with a tentative figure of 100,300 fatalities distributed between Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.

 

Fighting back isn't easy. Sometimes, you can smother a peatland fire by pumping water into the turf, but this technique requires a huge amount of time, effort and planning. Waiting for them to die of natural causes is an exercise in frustration. As we've established, it can take a months or years for one of these fires to burn through its fuel supply. Intense rainstorms have been known to put them out, but if the peat gets struck by lightning, that can make it smolder again.

 

Alas, a wildland firefighter's job is never done.

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 11:08 a.m. No.6253993   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4155

>>6253781

>>6253784 >>6253787

 

Agree that these are good matches. So let's make sense of the matches with explicit reasoning.

 

Bob Mueller has high probablity – John Down and POTUS have referred to Robert Mueller as "Bob" and, of course, he has been investigating some individuals suspected to be plants.

 

Thots on others?

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 11:26 a.m. No.6254155   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4203

>>6253993

 

I think "The START" has another less obvious meaning in this context. Triage.

 

Simple Triage And Rapid Treatment.

 

The context is moar social, political, emotional, and mental suffering. START is about quickly assessing the "victim" – legally, politically, and the like – and tagging the individual for this or that level of urgency and treatment. Sorting the buggers out, in the context of the Swamp.

 

PAINIC – also has the meaning of the acronym Patriots Are Now In Control.

 

Plants form a category within the range, yes?

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 11:36 a.m. No.6254261   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4328

>>6253781

 

[NO NAME][MEDIA - [JB][JC] LEAKS—→POTUS Daily Brief/FBI]

 

[NO NAME] [previously, J Sid McCain]

[currently, new, M Romney?]

 

[MEDIA - [which?] Note no closing bracket.

 

[JB] [James Baker] both in FBI PDBs?

[John Brennan]

 

[JC] [James Clapper] both in FBI PDBs?

[James Comey]

 

Clearly the mention of PDB = Hussein

Would it not also = Joe Biden?

Another [JB]

 

Would that lean toward Joe Biden also being assumed rather than singled out as [JB}? Might mean that James Baker more likely in FBI PDB, since John Brennan would be in CIA PDB?

 

Possibly mention of FBI means we are to assume James Comey in PDB, so perhaps that does leave James Clapper as [JC]?

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 11:43 a.m. No.6254328   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4359

>>6254261

 

Archive

 

President Obama and Vice President Biden’s Daily Public Schedules Now Online

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2010/07/26/president-obama-and-vice-president-biden-s-daily-public-schedules-now-online

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 11:45 a.m. No.6254359   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4394

>>6254328

 

In 2014, the PDB transitioned from a print product to electronic delivery at the request of President Barack Obama.

 

https://www.intelligence.gov/publics-daily-brief/presidents-daily-brief

 

Given the sensitive nature of the information, most PDBs—even those from many years past—remain classified. However, the CIA has declassified and released thousands of PDBs (or PDB predecessors) produced during the administrations of Presidents Kennedy, Johnson , Nixon, and Ford . They can be accessed on the CIA website's FOIA section .

Anonymous ID: e188cf April 20, 2019, 11:49 a.m. No.6254394   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6254359

 

In the first six weeks of the presidential transition of Donald Trump in 2016, the President-elect averaged about one PDB a week. He had "participated in multiple PDBs in some weeks, CNN has learned. And the transition team said last week Trump would be increasing his PDB participation to three times a week."[20] In mid-December 2016, the CIA website said Obama had initiated electronic delivery of the written brief in 2014 and that he received it six days a week.[3]

 

FWIW, maybe 0.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President%27s_Daily_Brief