Anonymous ID: 8d81ef April 20, 2019, 10:47 p.m. No.6260174   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0241

>>6260128

It's the WaPo, anon. Citing "sources." There's absolutely nothing to support their

claim and they know it. They're lying in a desperate attempt to denigrate Barr

which will then lead to the claim that Mueller actually wanted to indict Trump but

couldn't because of Barr.

 

It should be obvious by now that the DS needs Barr to be the bad guy for (((them)))

because Mueller didn't deliver.

Anonymous ID: 8d81ef April 20, 2019, 11:49 p.m. No.6260575   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0606

>>6260545

Doesn't matter who could vote then, it's been changed via amendment, which

the Constitution explicitly spelled out as a proper process. The 22nd of those

amendments also sets limits on terms for the President. Because of the process

defined in the ORIGINAL Constitution, all of those amendments now make up

the CURRENT Constitution.

Anonymous ID: 8d81ef April 21, 2019, 12:10 a.m. No.6260694   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6260662

It means the reason for the FISA isn't necessarily the "illegal" reason everyone is

complaining about, but maybe they (Trump) used their fuckery against the coup

plotters to spy back. Hence RR's signature on the July FISA. Since (((they)) had

set up an illegal version, the contents contained in the search can be used

against them. All of them.

Anonymous ID: 8d81ef April 21, 2019, 12:14 a.m. No.6260719   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6260692

I hope you realize the Miss Lube picture is not Nancy Pelosi. It was from 1951,

not 1959, and Nancy was only 11 at the time. The woman in that picture is not 11.

Worth noting that the original fake version actually said 1955, which would have

made it a little more believable "maybe that is Nancy at 15." You shills are getting

stupider by the day.