Anonymous ID: 310478 April 21, 2019, 8:49 a.m. No.6263280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3341 >>3443 >>3469

>>6262993

>>6262492, >>6262541 Anon points out that Militia leader was arrested on charge of being a Felon with firearms

>>6262265, >>6262542, >>6262583, >>6262615, >>6262664 Anons ANGERY!! re FBI arresting militia leader

 

I responded tot his event earluy on, with the opinion that the group did it the right way.

 

I still feel that way. Here's why:

 

1) The militia performed the correct action at the border. Lawful citizens arrests are a thing and so are lawful militias..

 

2)The militia leader correctly got arrested for breaking laws himself, as an individual..

 

It is what it is. Do you want full transparency, or not?

Anonymous ID: 310478 April 21, 2019, 8:58 a.m. No.6263367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3379

>>6263341

 

That was my point also.

 

Did you read point #1?

 

Pont #2 is just there to make sure you understand fully what fully transparency means.

 

Get used to it because this is the world [C_A] gave us.

 

Full transparency is now the only way forward. For better or worse.

Anonymous ID: 310478 April 21, 2019, 9:02 a.m. No.6263402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3502

>>6263379

 

That's where point #2 comes in.

 

Because this is done to any champion of a good cause that will get themselves on the radar.

 

They tried to do it to Donald Trump for fuck sakes.

 

This guy was easy pickings for [them].

 

Again, I'm not disagreeing with you, but people have to toughen the fuck up.

Anonymous ID: 310478 April 21, 2019, 9:08 a.m. No.6263484   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3495

>>6263443

 

It's why I feel the way I do.

 

The action was correct and in context to the law.

 

The individuals doing the action are comped. ''Probably on purpose for optics.''

 

It completely does not change my original response.