https://www.dailywire.com/news/46240/nyt-finally-acknowledges-steele-dossier-might-not-ashe-schow
DEAR NEW YORK TIMES:
ARE THE BLATANT LIARS WITH NO PROOF STILL PERMITTED TO REPORT AND OPINE FOR YOUR PUBLICATION?
ASKING FOR A FREN
https://www.longroom.com/discussion/1001991/nyt-s-goldberg-overwhelming-evidence-of-the-trump-campaign-s-collusion-with-russia
short of lawsuits, they really need to be called out for all of the many lies reported as facts,
and to add salt to the wound, they are continuing on in their lying spree
President Trump has been calling them out on their lies for 2 years plus, he might appreciate our help in this endeavor
https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1119067612577714177
Journalism is never having to say you’re sorry. Or wrong. That’s what much of the news media taught the American people this week.
Most news organizations downplayed, ignored or outright contradicted the conclusion of the report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller that there was no collusion between the Trump election campaign and Russia to help elect Donald Trump president in 2016.
But rather than celebrate the good news that presidential candidate Trump wasn’t secretly working with Russia to get to the Oval Office, many in the media set about trying to rewrite the report their own way.
TRUMP TAKES AIM AT ‘HIGHLY CONFLICTED’ MUELLER, ‘FAKE NEWS MEDIA’ AMID RUSSIA REPORT FALLOUT
Many journalists complained about cover-ups even before the redacted Mueller report was released. As a result of this and their past reporting on the president, their massive anti-Trump spin was a foregone conclusion.
In fact, the same journalists who scream about transparency and demand that Trump administration officials answer their questions suddenly complained because Attorney General William Barr held a news conference shortly before he released the report.
MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace accused Barr of trying to “shape the coverage” because he spoke to reporters before the Justice Department published the Mueller report on the Internet. She was joined by many others in the media who decided access to newsmakers was bad … if they countered the anti-Trump narrative.
The coverage didn’t go downhill from there. It fell off a cliff.
Talking heads shouted “collusion” in one breath and “impeachment” in the next. In just a 24-hour span there were 309 mentions of impeachment on broadcast news and liberal cable TV outlets. CNN led the pack, of course, with 148 mentions. MSNBC was close behind with 138. CNN reporter Dana Bash portrayed the Mueller report as “a road map to potential impeachment proceedings”
CNN political commentator Symone Sanders – who was national press secretary for Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., in his 2016 presidential campaign – made it clear she wants to go beyond impeachment. She blasted the justice system and argued that President Trump should “be in handcuffs right now.”
MSNBC anchor Brian Williams called Barr “Baghdad Bill Barr,” a reference to former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s spokesman, who told absurd lies to reporters. Yes, that came right out of the mouth of confessed liar Williams, who lost his prestigious job as anchor of the “NBC Nightly News” and was exiled to MSNBC for making up stories about his career and telling the lies on TV.
The media wouldn’t let go of the collusion fantasy. ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl said that “you might even say collusion” was detailed in the report. The Washington Post front page the day after the report was released had no headlines indicating the actual news – that the Trump campaign wasn’t guilty of collusion.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/dan-gainor-media-wont-drop-false-collusion-claims-against-trump-as-reporter-demands-sarah-sanders-be-fired