This crap about goog brought this previous Q post to mind, especially the section close to the end in the [Example] section. Unfortunately, at work so can't do the graphic so:
2793
Big Tech Testing Scenarios to Prevent Anti-Narrative Cross-Talk Across Social Media Platforms
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
18 Feb 2019 - 1:50:20 PM
Chatter uptick re: how to effectively prevent cross-talk re: anti-narrative across all social media/online platforms.
Ability to prevent cross-talk narrows comms only to FAKE NEWS which provides for more control over what is released to inform the public.
A series of scenarios is currently being conducted ['game the sys'] to test response, risk, and calc results.
'Censorship' [added] layers of inserted code 'through keyword targeting' in bio, history, and comments + indiv platform mods has failed to curtail the problem.
'China-Russia-Iran' 'fake' take-down hacks of select platforms (for maintenance) is one scenario being game-played.
[Zero-Day]
Countermeasures in place.
**[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.
Think WH controlled new RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled new video stream platform**
Think Here.
Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as 'Public Utility' (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).
Why do we make things public?
Q
==
Certainly would like an update. Feel pretty confident that once The Maestro and Team have set up"
WH controlled new video stream platform
we can all flee goog/yt censorshi.p