https://medium.com/@l.facchin/in-my-opinion-binney-might-have-misrepresented-the-content-of-the-letter-880bf5c9d0a3
http://archive.is/rtdwx
Binney might have misrepresented the content of the letter
re:
NSA Has 32 Pages of Communications Between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, As Revealed by a FOIA Request
re: previous notable
I will link to it below, but I will also try to summarize the topic of Clevenger inquiry, just in case the link might end up not working anymore in the future.
According to the NSA reply, Ty Clevenger inquired about “documents, records or communications referencing or containing communications between Seth Rich and any of the following: Julian Assange, Wikileaks, Kim Dotcom, Aaron Rich, Shawn Lucas, Kelsey Mulka, Imran Awan, Abid Awan, Jamal Awan, Hina Alvi, Rao Abbas and/or any person or entity outside the United States” and about documents regarding financial transactions between the same people.
He also asked about records of phone calls made or received by Seth Rich the day before or the same day he was killed.
And finally he asked about correspondence to or from members of Congress regarding the same list of people.
So, I would say that Ty Clevenger’s FOIA request is way too ecompassing for people to be sure that some of the 15 documents the NSA says meets the FOIA request parameters are actually about communications between Seth Rich and Assange or Wikileaks. They might be. But there are too many people in the list to be able to tell with any certainty.
Anyway. Here’s the link to the text of the NSA reply to Ty Clevenger’s FOIA request.
— snip