God bless you and keep you from harm, this day and forever.
Climate Scientist Insults POTUS
(8 x and still working for USG)
When not fabricating evidence for papers on climate science USG EMPLOYEE and UK citizen Ben David Santer has a second job attacking POTUS in Scientific American.
He’s no better attacking POTUS than he is at science, calling him stupid in 8 of ten articles for the tragically fallen Scientific American magazine.
Summary of Ben Santer's last 10 SA articles:
1) Climate Change: POTUS won't accept it. Therefore, Stoopid!
2) POTUS supports a racist border wall that won't work – suffering from stoopidation of brain.
3) POTUS fails to" test his assumptions against reality" ++estupido
4) President Ozymandias POTUS could limit greenhouse gas emissions but won't ‘cause Orange Man bad," Stoopidified!
5) The Flood is coming. Keeping citizens safe from floods is POTUS job and he won't do it! Stoopidation is why.
6) "Self-styled 'stable' genius' is a danger to stability! Stupississimus QED!
7) Alternative Facts about climate change: POTUS uses 'em. ‘Cause? Extreme stooopid.
8) By rejecting the Paris climate accords POTUS cedes moral leadership of the world to Venezuela. More Orange stoopidism.
Out of 10 Ben Santer articles, 8 attack POTUS, all ineptly.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/author/ben-santer/.
Santer originally worked at the University of East Anglia's climate science lab, which is notorious for pushing questionable papers, and which occupies a dirty Martel tower with moldy grout and faded crazed tiling on a rundown midlands campus. (see pic) East Anglia climate labs has reputation as dirty as the filthy run down cylindrical building they inhabit for fudging the numbers to make climate papers "clearer than the truth."
>Santer was the convening Lead Author of Chapter 8 of 1995 IPCC Working Group I Report (AR2 WGI), which addressed the global warming issue.
>Frederick Seitz, in a June 12, 1996 editorial-page piece in the Wall Street Journal complained that alterations made to Chapter 8 of the 1995 IPCC report were made to "deceive policy makers and the public into believing that the scientific evidence shows human activities are causing global warming." Similar charges were made by the Global Climate Coalition (GCC), a consortium of industry interests; specifically, they accused Santer of "scientific cleansing."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_D._Santer
>On February 25, 2019 Santer et al. published the paper Celebrating the anniversary of three key evens in climate change science in Nature Climate Change, claiming to have reached the 5-sigma "gold standard level" of statistical proof of human influence in global climate change using three sets of satellite data.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es063000t
This fake science pushing Climate Jihadi is not a scientist but an ideologue and almost certainly a cult operator.
Ben “Slimin’ lizard of fake science” Santer actually works for US government as a climate scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Lab.
Livermore lab was initially built for Edward Teller, because Los Alamos wouldn’t have him, or any other existing nuke lab. Teller’s colleagues despised him (unfairly IMO) for failing to defend Robert Oppenheimer when Leo Strauss when after him of the pretext he was a commie and had Oppies security clearance lifted and booted him off the AEC. Oppenheimer had been a commie, that was documented and it’s how Leslie Groves controlled him. To return to Santer, Livermore was built for the outcast of physics, Teller to build the “zooper,” the H bomb, which he did. You might call it clown harbor, and there you’ll find Ben Santer, mediocre scientist and piss poor polemicist, flapping around on big yellow clown feet.
nein. What's his OS?
Re Lion Payseur
Louis IV was not a bad King. He had his trouble with satanists too. Which the modern cult is still trying to cover up. Payseur has no reason to love satanist, or the masons, for they organized the French Revolution.
The scandal that rocked the French Government of Louis IV was enormous.
>The most famous case was that of midwife Catherine Deshayes Monvoisin or La Voisin, who was arrested in 1679 after she was incriminated by the poisoner Marie Bosse. La Voisin implicated a number of important individuals in the French court. These included Olympia Mancini, the Countess of Soissons, her sister the Duchess of Bouillon, François Henri de Montmorency, Duke of Luxembourg and, most importantly, the king's mistress, Madame de Montespan.
>Questioned while intoxicated,[1] La Voisin claimed that Montespan had bought aphrodisiacs and performed black masses with her in order to gain and keep the king's favor over rival lovers. She had worked with a priest named Étienne Guibourg. There was no evidence beyond her confessions, but bad reputations followed these people afterwards. Eleanor Herman, in her book Sex with Kings, claims that the police, given reports of "babies' bones", uncovered the remains of 2,500 infants in La Voisin's garden.[2] However, Anne Somerset disputes this in her book The Affair of the Poisons and states there is no mention of the garden being searched for human remains.[3]
>The Poison Affair implicated 442 suspects: 367 orders of arrests were issued, of which 218 were carried out. Of the condemned, 36 were executed; five were sentenced to the galleys; and 23 to exile. This excludes those who died in custody by torture or suicide. Additionally, many accused were never brought to trial, but placed outside of the justice system and imprisoned for life by a lettre de cachet.
>Of the people who were condemned to perpetual imprisonment by lettre de cachet, six women were imprisoned at Château de Villefranche; 18 men at Château de Salces; 12 women at Belle-Île-en-Mer; ten men at Château de Besançon; 14 women at St Andre de Salins; and five women at Fort de Bains.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affair_of_the_Poisons
If Leone P is of that line he may well be sincere and living in straightened circumstances as a result of what the satanic cultists did to his family.
If you want to examine the character of the French government and those who composed it, the two volume memoirs of the Duc de Saint Simon are astute and amusing and a good place to start.
There have always been members of the bloodlines who have fought for and defended mankind. Sometimes they were rulers at other times scholars, never Tammany Hall polls.
We oughtn't make assumptions about anyone based on a label assigned them by something as fallible as common knowledge.