Baker
re: notable from previous bread
>>6272287, >>6272322, >>6272267 Anons dig on Lara Prychodko
this is from July 2018
wtf is this doing in notables??
newfags, 2 nypost articles that were "dug up" almost a year ago and discussed ad nauseum are not notable
how is this relevant? anons AND bakers should be making that connection crystal clear
otherwise, notables are complete shit. which they have been for months since newfags became bakers and decided everything was new to them. some of us are tired of this bullshit.
it's up to anons to make sure notables are good. it's not all about the baker. anons used to be vigilant. putting old digs up there make us look like retards.
and i'm a baker so you can fuck right off.
then MAKE THAT CONNECTION CLEAR
post your new tunnel discovery. that would be new and notable. reposting the fucking nypost article is ridiculous. that's not a dig. it's a msm article anyone can find by googling her name. are there any autists left here??
read my posts this bread. i've already told you what constructive changes to make. the relevance to current happenings needs to be made clear, i.e. why is this being brought up again? i haven't been on the board today til now. i should be able to look at both the 3 posts and the description and understand why this is relevant (again). it's really easy to call everyone who disagrees with you or calls you out a shill. i'm a baker too. take the constructive criticism.
and no, things have always been happening. especially last july. that's not excuse for notables becoming a garbage heap.