Notable
The current state of /qresearch/ and why it must be protected at all costs
exactly.
and fyi this is a great example of bringing up something old and showing how it is relevant to /qresearch/ now.
just reposting an old article and "digs" that any 5 year old that can google could bring up is not notable
meta-notable is right.
kek, no but i was on that anon's side. no worries though. i'm just fed up so i apologize for the bitter tone. i appreciate bakers and want to protect this dedicated research space. bakers play a bigger role than they realize. they guide research by curating notables. and like another anon said, bakers police anons and anons police bakers. it used to be more of a symbiotic relationship. now both bakers and anons are complacent it seems, and any constructive criticism is immediately disregarded with "don't attack bakers" finger-wagging. structure is needed if we want to keep this place from degrading even further than it already has. and the only way that will be possible is if anons, especially oldfags, keep each other and bakers in check. this isn't a chat room. this isn't reddit. this is a dedicated research space where the biggest intel drops in history are being made. there were always shitposts but they used to be complemented with good digs and theories - aka real work. now it's all fun and games and no work.
it doesn't/didn't have to be inevitable. and board staff could be doing a better job protecting this board from faggotry.
censorship? are you kidding me? this is a research space. have you read the welcome page? might need a reminder.
https://8ch.net/qresearch/welcome.html
rules are there for a reason. to provide structure. establishing and enforcing rules does not amount to censorship.
agreed, anon. we need to get our shit together.
i don't think this is just because of a lull. i think this is a degradation of the board that started months ago and has only gotten worse, regardless of whether Q drops or not.
i'm not advocating an end to shiptosting, nor would i ever. i'm just advocating for tighter notables and more vigilance on the part of both anons and bakers in maintaining this board.
this is true as well. we do need heavy lifting to be done. and that's another aspect of it. less tweeting, more doing. but that's all coming soon. we can't control Q's timeline or POTUS's actions. we CAN control our own contributions to the effort.
thanks, anon. this discussion was more about substantive notables and intelligent discussion/digs than anything else. shitposts and shills will be here no matter what and that's fine. just saying there should be some good shit too, you know?
but i've eaten up enough bread. this will get lost in the mix anyway. can't herd cats.
please please go back to reddit.