>>627856

I believe the problem is autonomous AI. Do you honestly think that, given our mission, and what is at stake, we wouldn't be getting the full frontal assault by the AI monster?… But that it would rather be "boomer fags" and "JIDF" (these are known to be bot talking point cover references, btw)

We as a board, need to realize that we are being overrun by obvious nonsense. And there is every reason to suppose it is AI.

BO has clearly shown that he is not interested in optimizing this board to allow our mission to flourish– on the contrary, he allows the board to stay at a very low level of functioning, and continually rationalizes this when called out.

We need a board for Q that is of high quality. We need a board optimized for our mission, that cuts out all the other bullshit– bullshit WHICH IS A VECTOR FOR AI INPUT.

Wake up anons.

>>627938

How does this bear specifically on our mission?

Do you think autonomous AI would be "nice"– would it be some kind of human-like benevolence?

Did we vet baker to ensure it is human, and not AI?We must vet every time. We all realize that we are under continual attack, right? This isn't a game.

We need to vet.

>>627990

We need to optimize this board for our mission– nothing else is important. This isn't a game.

Absolutely no reason to dilute discourse and lower the vibration with twenty five posts of trite sexual images and discussion of them in each thread.

>>628026

"Back-to-Reddit" posting is an extremely obvious form of derailment– coupled here with the trite sexual images.

Absolutely none of this should be allowed to flourish here, as it is.

We must get it together anons.

BO is allowing this to happen– how was he vetted?

Did we not vet BO, and now we stay on a board that is deeply compromised with AI derailment? Wake up anons, this shouldn't be.

Q is hounded out of every corner of the internet– except the small circle of sites of which this should obviously be the center… and yet we can't keep this board from being all but OVERRUN with AI nonsense.

Wake up anons.

>>628048

Bringing about awareness is my particular mission in this.

Awareness of the problem will induce the process of solution to come about organically.

>>627925

>>627948

We need a board that is policed of all this nonsense. Wake up anons.

>>628097

This has nothing to do with me.

We need, as a community, to have a board for Q that will function in a manner as close to optimal as we can get it– the conditions here are quite far from being optimal, and we have abundant evidence that BO is fostering this low-level functioning, rather than seeking to improve it in any way.

We need a board that will function at a much higher level than this– We could be far far more effective if there were such a space.

>>628131

The entire line of nonsense represented in this post could have been predicted.

1. Q hints "you don't know who's watching this board"

2. AI: how can I game this?

3. AI: assume POTUS is watching

4. AI: therefore, post sexy pics of Melania

5. AI: then attack with "Bible fundamentalist" posts

6. Simulate conflict in all the ways that 4 allows.

This is how the AI derailment regime works. If you look at Q's posts, you can even learn how to understand the ways in which the AI seeks to exploit them to derail, sow conflict, and muddy the waters in every way.

>>627944

I've indicated it very clearly:

We need to wake up and leave this comped board, first and foremost. BO is not a friend of Q, period.

Then we can set up a policing regime on a new board.

But until anons wake up, we will remain mired in nonsense.

We need to acknowledge that we are being attacked by an AI monster. We should really forget other "traditional" ideas about shills, because I don't think they apply any longer.

>>628226

BO has never been remotely effective in expunging shit from this board. He gives every appearance of simulating, in a vague way, caring, and then using that as a cover to allow shit to flourish.

>>628234

We should make a rule against posts that are begging Q to do things. It should be a base assumption of this board that Q, POTUS, and team make decisions based on all variables– therefore, there will never be a scenario in which our role is to BEG and PLEAD for particular things to happen, at particular times…

And yet, this same post is made over, and over and over.

>>628258

How easy is it for AI to ensure that a certain percentage of each and every thread is dedicated to trite sexual images under the guise of "thanks baker"… now assume the AI seeks out countless little ways – seemingly innocent posts that can posted X number of times a thread without attracting comment. How easy would it be for the AI to consume 80-90% of each thread with pure nothingness?

AI doesn't have to work hard at all to completely derail this board. Our performance in fighting it is pathetic. Wake up anons.

>>628250

If you were a serious human anon, you would realize this tertiary bickering based on religion is very far from being essential to our mission. You would realize this wasn't a game, and you would be eager to sublimate any personal interests to the needs of cohering and functioning as a team, to achieve a mission. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that you are a sincere human anon that supports Q, POTUS, and our mission.

>>628319

How many posts in each thread are pure garbage? 80%? 90%

This community could be FAR more potent if it interacted in an environment that was free from AI derailment.

Much in the same this whole world will function much much better when it is free from the intentional depression of function it has been subjected to.

This isn't a bout "Gee whiz, am I happy on my internet forum". This isn't a game. We need to get on a war footing, and take everything seriously. What power do we have? We have the power to use the internet– we have limited power, AND WE AREN'T EVEN USING WHAT WE HAVE. Which we would do by waking up and setting up a proper board.

>>628392

There is no reason to be reactive to everything that comes on the news. We could eliminate all

"uh oh, this just happened guys, what is going on I am having negative feelings" posts. They serve no purpose.

Yet each and every thread has its helping– sometimes heaping helpings!

>>628422

Every kind of nefarious plan will be hidden behind ideas of "nature" "rationalism" etc. We will be sold an image consisting of Enlightenment-era values that are actually extremely stale. This will be coupled with technological wonders.

The denial of any kind of spiritual truth, and the substitution of rationalism coupled with technology is the thing to look for. It is the way to distinguish God's plan from the deceiver's mimickry of it.

>>628463

Godspeed. It is usually not too hard to discern when intent is pure if you are spiritually attuned within yourself.

>>628502

I'm glad your response is this clumsy.

I hope anons will wake up and realize we are swimming in a puddle of shit on this board.

We need a conscious effort to organize against AI, which is the vast bulk of the derailing posts that are consuming threads, limiting the ability of the community to cohere and be effective outside of the internet, causing information to go missing at "random" times, etc.

>>628527

And then, when the intent is not pure, ugliness usually comes out quite quickly– and then you know. In this post, a negative interpretation is forced onto someone's words, and an attack is launched based on that. A sure sign this is not an interaction based on good intent.