Anonymous ID: d9b58a March 11, 2018, 7:55 a.m. No.627802   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7817 >>7819 >>7834 >>7979 >>8154 >>8176 >>8539

GUN CONTROL = PRO LIFE? lawfag here…

Q POSTED:

Review Congressional investigation.

Re_read drops PP.

We are working to END.

EVIL.

Not as it appears.

OK - I am 100% confident that (lead mastermind) Q is a rightous patriot with a real historic and monumental anti-cabal plan being executed by POTUS before our very eyes. I am not a slide clown or shill. But if an anon is pro-choice. as are the majority of WE THE PEOPLE then this is taking sides on a divisive issue. Maybe not this board but now we will find out via this post.

The serious problem concerns PP and Q's posts theron. I will say we ALL can agree that if PP or anyone else commits acts of pedophilia, child traffing, or any other ILLEGAL acts then they should be DESTROYED. We can call those "Nefarious Acts." Of course pro-life persons consider ALL abortions nefarious - indeed murder.

But since abortions are in fact LEGAL, we must exclude abortion from the Nafarious designation. I will exclude from the "Nefarious" category purely technical violations of law - which were documents in the report. I say technical becase the violations had to do only with the reimbursement formulas used, and questions whether fetal tissue "crossed state lines" which is a violation of federal law, but NOT state law, which often permits the sale and use of fetal material for reserach. A complete table of state laws may be found here: http:// www.ncsl.org/research/health/embryonic-and-fetal-research-laws.aspx

Of course most of the restrictions on use of fetal material are born from the intense desire of pro life activists to make it impossible or impractical to perform abortions. This is equivalemt to complex and massive regulations which are put in place to inhibit excercise of a constituiional right (ie GUN OWNERSHIP) which is legal yet poltically unpopular among a large number of citizens.

In any event - I did exactly as Q asked and reviewed the testimony and report of the hearing on PP. The report can be seen here:

https:// archives-energycommerce.house.gov/sites/republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/files/documents/Select_Investigative_Panel_Final_Report.pdf

There is NO EVIDENCE in those hearings or the report - NONE - that PP has commited acts of pedophilia, child traffing, or any other nefarious acts. Is there any evidence of this? If so the Q and any Anon who cares - please show it to us all NOW so we understand why PP "is not as it appears." This report fails to do anything like that.

I will certainly say that if clinics are PAYING women to get abortions so they can make a profit that is nefarious. But there is no evidence of that in the report. Again where is the evidence? If the report is the best evidecne Q has, then I will conclude that Q is pro life and using the Second Revoluaiotn to move to that goal. That is very different from the nefarious acts which constitute the bulk of the Q focus. A pro-choice partriot will reasonably find that wrongful. If Q has evidence that PP participates in or commits nefarious acts PLEASE PROVIDE IT so all anons are not just voting pro life w/o our consent. This is yet another issue that DIVIDES WE THE PEOPLE and takes us away from our primary goal to RESTORE LIBERTY.

LIBERTY = the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views. Emphasis on "ONE" = my way of life = my choices = I alone am morally resonsible for the excercise of my free will.

Anonymous ID: d9b58a March 11, 2018, 8:41 a.m. No.628221   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8369

>>628176

i agree 100% but you miss the point - if YOU believe abortion is evil then PP is evil too

but what if you dont believe abortion is evil? do you say no one has the right to that opinion?

if so isnt that like antifa cramming their views down out throats?

Anonymous ID: d9b58a March 11, 2018, 8:44 a.m. No.628259   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8381

>>627856

you are falling for the division

ok you can be pro life - that is your right and others have the right to disagree

if you or Q can show sauce on PP we all want to see it

Anonymous ID: d9b58a March 11, 2018, 8:47 a.m. No.628276   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8285

>>627834

just re-watched the okeefe video - the video is a nothing burger

can you imagine if a pro 2A person was grilled over wine and dinner in a secret taping?

please point out the part which you say proves she and/or PP is evil

not just because you are pro life

Anonymous ID: d9b58a March 11, 2018, 8:49 a.m. No.628297   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>627819

you are aware that state law permits the "selling" of body parts inc organ transplants

selling is "not for profit"

if someone proves profit than you have a violation of law but not cabal evil

Anonymous ID: d9b58a March 11, 2018, 9:03 a.m. No.628400   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>628176

that is true but isnt the key question what YOU consider right/moral may not be the same as what others think?

of course laws reflect the "super majority" of opinion in a given culture - by super i mean the vast majority of laws are based on broad consensus- abortion is an exception due to the religious convictions of many citizens - but still a majority of americans understand and accept the need for this unfortunate procedure but with many limits - that is the law - do people violate the law? yes - so do the gun shooters - does that mean we outlaw guns? no we arrest and prosecute the violators and LEAVE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS ALONE

Anonymous ID: d9b58a March 11, 2018, 9:16 a.m. No.628543   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>628369

ok i get it - you are 100% pro life- you are trying to force your moral conclusion on others

btw killing does not = murder

(think self defense, wartime, execution are not murder)

only a non justified killing is murder

so is it your position that any anon who is pro choice is an evil murderer?

if so you must be very miserable and need to ask jesus what to do