>>6278621 PB
Guess what, anon? That "old" Zerohedge article isn't in the archive yet. Maybe baker checked. Did you?
TYB, great job!
You most be the highest-ranking anon. Thank you for gracing us with your thoughts.
>>6278621 PB
Guess what, anon? That "old" Zerohedge article isn't in the archive yet. Maybe baker checked. Did you?
TYB, great job!
You most be the highest-ranking anon. Thank you for gracing us with your thoughts.