>>6279827

>Democratic leaders double down on muzzling impeachment talk

but

<"I'm all for impeaching Barr," she quipped, referring to AG Barr, whose report on Mueller's investigation sought to exonerate the president.

So really it's not about caution on impeachment at all.

It's about changing the target.

>>6280006

Do a search for adjacent numbers.

All searches are in quotes e.g. "131 million"

130 million = 3,530k hits

131 million = 185k hits

132 million = 258k hits

133 million = 260k hits

134 million = 226k hits

135 million = 732k hits

136 million = 208k hits

137 million = 223k hits

>138 million = 499k hits

139 million = 239k hits

140 million = 1,890k hits

141 million = 196k hits

Most numbers are around 200k-250k or so.

Predictable spikes at 130 and 140, and somewhat smaller spike at 135.

138 is certainly an outlier.

>>6280041

>>6280083

Without corroborating sauce I would have expected either The Onion or NPC Daily.

>>6280095

I just see it the same as refusing to wish Merry Christmas b/c "not inclusive enough".