>>6281279

Unlikely. She was never military so the only way tribunals would apply is if she

literally took up arms against US forces. Ya'll ought to read what it takes for

trying US citizens in tribunals. Treason and sedition aren't sufficient.

>>6281415

She didn't pick up a gun and fire at US forces.

>>6281416

Death penalty isn't about getting rid of evil, it's about justice. The death penalty

only kicks the can down the road so to speak - evil will continue to rise up no

matter what.

>>6281446

And the law.

>>6281466

Unlikely. What you're talking about may be treasonous, but not taking up arms.

I don't know why everybody wants tribunals so badly. Our judicial system

is completely capable of handling what is coming. The prosecutors are probably better at it anyway since they handle

so many more cases (and have been working on this for 2 years already).

>>6281513

The law should be a raw nerve for everybody. You're the ones that

seem to think it's OK to throw away our system of justice because

you want revenge. The rule of law is for thee, not for me, right?

If that's the case, all of this is for naught. Everything Q and Trump

are fighting for is lost before it even has a chance to begin. I think

that's a pretty shitty position to take.

>>6281545

So what? We've got thousands of prosecutors in this country. How on earth

do you think a system designed to deal with a crimes committed within a

population of only a few million will deal with this case load?

>>6281557

>She sold highly classified information to our adversaries

Are you incapable of reading? Treason is not sufficient reason to be tried

under UCMJ. She would LITERALLY have to pick up a gun herself and

fire on US forces. The law is clear. Look it up FFS.

>>6281575

How does that have anything to do with military tribunals? Did I say

her acts weren't treasonous?

>>6281582

So what? That doesn't somehow make it alright to start violating US citizens' rights.

Those rights apply to all of us, particularly when accused of a crime, even a heinous

crime. The law is clear on who tribunals apply to.

You're going to have to try harder. Offering platitudes doesn't cut it.

Also, Q has made it clear Trump has been cleaning up the swamp, stacking the courts

with HIS judges. Pull your head out

of your ass.

>>6281609

The cartoonist cum psychology expert. Self-proclaimed. I love those authorities.

>>6281623

I just find him too stiff. I hope he's not who they have planned for the

next President in 2025.

>>6281627

Again, how is that sufficient justification to revoke citizens' rights? It's

on the government to figure it out.

Also, again, the US Military court system is set up to deal with a population of a few million at best, and they have a relatively low

crime rate to begin with. Our normal justice system is set up to

handle not only a higher crime rate, but about 150x more people.

Now, you tell me, exactly how with that teaspoon in the ocean be

of sufficient help? Hint: it can't.