Anonymous ID: 0ef9e0 April 23, 2019, 4:57 p.m. No.6289629   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9644 >>9734

>>6289597

That was the whole point. The report pointed out that there isn't

evidence one way or another. This is the equivalent of

"no obstruction." The left doesn't want to accept that so

they'll walk off a cliff into the trap Trump just set.

Anonymous ID: 0ef9e0 April 23, 2019, 5:13 p.m. No.6289764   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6289734

Yes. Nancy knows this, btw. She's desperate to get them to stop, but

she can't. They've gone too far. They've said they have the evidence

to impeach on obstruction. If they stop without trying, they say to their

base that they really aren't serious and have been lying. If they

keep going it comes out that there really isn't anything, and oh,

btw, here's everything the President actually has on all of them.

Anonymous ID: 0ef9e0 April 23, 2019, 5:37 p.m. No.6289983   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6289957

Sadly, this board gets used as a search engine too often. I suppose

we could see it as a sign anons are trusted for advice, because usually

they tend to be tech-savvy…

Anonymous ID: 0ef9e0 April 23, 2019, 6:06 p.m. No.6290272   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0279

>>6290176

There's only been 2 prosecutions of the act in history, both failed to

yield a conviction. It is widely expected that a successful prosecution

would ultimate end up in the Supreme Court and the law deemed

unconstitutional. It's a hope to hang on to.