>>6291822 (pb)

interdasting. img>txt. very interdasting.

either Q's 'James 8. Corney' was intentional (8 is nowhere near B and RN is two letters vs. M), or an image was converted to text then used for Q's post.

if the second occurrence, the question becomes why? what could be the reason to construct an image, comprised of text, then convert that image back to text, via a img>txt program?

in your experience, are there any other common words that img>txt gets wrong?

how about confrimed>confinned?

>pic related

likely that Q used a img>txt converter for this post #2943. Why?

>>6292024

so . .

secure storage of future posts?

information/post as txt file convert for storage as image > encrypt for security.

decrypt convert image to text > add relevant links > post

sounds like future proves past to me, if valid.