>>6298565

The efforts to attack Boeing and thereby sink GDP are pretty blatant.

Many others have had worse problems and not gotten this kind of scrutiny.

If what this fool is saying is true, then why did the MAX fly safely in the US for a decade before all the hyper focus?

Ratlines stretch quite far, and killing GDP for the year with just one target is pretty fucked.

>>6298663

Ask yourself this: Would the globalist cabal be satisfied with a few million people dying slowing over decades from cancer, or would they rather interrupt industrial farming in such a way that 2~3 billion starve in six months?

The plan is obvious if you just open your eyes.