Silly thought, but putting it out there.

In Q drop 1788 (pic), Q indicates that there’s one person who can answer the Q—POTUS.

Then Q posts [Less than 10]

Which relates to the idea that less than 10 people are officially informed about Q. But it’s a curious statement in this context because Q has just established that only one person can answer the Q, as in the other 9 or less who are “in” can’t answer the Q (obv. confirmation has to come from POTUS).

So, I want to read this [Less than 10] as binary 10, that is: 2.

Only one can answer

POTUS

[Less than 2]

I’ll start looking for other instances where a binary reading could reasonably apply after lunch.

>>6299580

Not sure at all. It’s a fairly standard interpretation for that line, but I don’t think it always (has) to be people. I think once, Q made it explicit that less than 10 people are fully read in (I might be misremembering), but I don’t think that means that’s how we always interpret the line.

>>6299608

Misplaced my parens. Should read

(always) has