Thinking you mean UNredacted. We already have the redacted one.
>referrals
As in "referrals from Congress?" Ok, I'm excited now. Joy. Yeah. Holder has been
in contempt of Congres for how long now?
Criminal referrals are part of a stage show. Indictments are the only things
that have any meaning, and even then, they are often misdirection as well.
Think Flynn…
Understood. Joe D. is guessing, but I'll admit, from a more informed position
than I have. But any time one of these talking heads rambles on about "reerrals,"
they're talking about Nunes and Congress, and a lack of ability to prosecute. At the
end of the day, Barr doesn't need what Congress is delivering. What Congress is delivering is for public consumption,
which I suppose is Q's point. No argument there.
There's a reason his flight details were public… maybe someone will
figure it out at some point.
I suppose one of the "protections" from abuse is the massive paper trail required to
use the spying apparatus we set up. The reason (((they))) needed to win is because
(((they))) needed to have a way to
sweep that paper trail under the rug, otherwise it would enventually come out. When
the hag lost, (((they))) knew what was coming.
Yeah, they knew, they knew.
^^^^^^ Yes.
I find it interesting how much effort anons are putting into CTH (THeLastRefuge2)
theories. Sundance has "followers" roaming around on twatter as well, trying to
get people on board with his nonsense. They're immune to logic, and ultimately just leave when they can't win an argument,
but there are many of them, and they are all devoid of the ability to construct
a logical argument. The fact that we keep seeing these "compelling" argumetns
in here is not a coincidence.
He's right. But the left won't relent. So his next role will get realized